ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2819|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

1stzhang的三个纯逻辑

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-4-30 19:06:00 | 只看该作者

1stzhang的三个纯逻辑

这种题目管为东说不考但是我还是遇到了,所以一问.
(1). Some people have questioned why the Homeowners Association is supporting Cooper?’s candidacy for mayor. But if the Association wants a mayor who will attract more businesses to the town, Cooper is the only candidate it could support. So, since the Association is supporting Cooper, it mist have a goal of attracting more businesses to the town.

The reasoning in the argument is in error because

(A) the reasons the Homeowners Association should want to attract more businesses to the town are not given

(B) the Homeowners Association could be supporting Cooper?’s candidacy for reasons unrelated to attracting businesses to the town

(C) other groups besides the Homeowners Association could be supporting Cooper?’ s candidacy

(D) the Homeowners Association might discover that attracting more businesses to the town would not be in the best interest of its members

(E) Cooper might not have all of the skills that are needed by a mayor who wants to attract businesses to a town


13. Editorial: In rejecting the plan proposed by parliament to reform the electoral process, the president clearly acted in the best interests of the nation. Anyone who thinks otherwise should remember that the president made this decision knowing it would be met with fierce opposition at home and widespread disapproval abroad. All citizens who place the nation’s well-being above narrow partisan interests will applaud this courageous action.

The reasoning in the editorial is in error because

(A) it confused a quality that is merely desirable in a political leader with a quality that is essential to effective political decision-making

(B) it fails to distinguish between evidence concerning the courage required to make a certain decision and evidence concerning the wisdom of making that decision

(C) it ignores the likelihood that many citizens have no narrow partisan interest in the proposed

(D) it overlooks the possibility that there was strong opposition to the parliament’s plan among members of the president's among members of the president's own party

(E) it depends on the unwarranted assumption that any plan proposed by a parliament will necessarily serve only narrow partisan interests


26.Why should the government, rather than industry or universities, provide the money to put a network of supercomputers in place? Because there is a range of problems that can be attacked only with the massive data-managing capacity of a supercomputer network. No business or university has the resources to purchase by itself enough machines for a whole network, and no business or university wants to invest in a part of a network if no mechanism exists for coordinating establishment of the network as a whole.

Which one of the following indicates a weakness in the argument?

(A) It does not furnish a way in which the dilemma concerning the establishment of the network can be resolved.

(B) It does not establish the impossibility of creating a supercomputer network as an international network.

(C) It fails to address the question of who would maintain the network if the government, rather than industry or universities, provides the money for establishing it.

(D) It takes for granted and without justification that it would enhance national preeminence in science for the government to provide the network.

(E) It overlooks the possibility that businesses or universities, or both, could cooperate to build the network.
沙发
发表于 2003-4-30 21:07:00 | 只看该作者
1. B 原文:to attract business(A), 就要support Cooper(B). 逻辑关系为B为A的必要条件A-->B. ETS可能从几个角度出题:1. 非B-->非A 不support就不attract business (对); 2. B-->A support就一定attract business (错); 3. B-->A support说明HO要attract business (错)

B为第三种. 举一个例子: 如果我要出国, 就一定要考GMAT;现在我考了GMAT, 说明我一定要出国.

2. B 需要你确定答案.

3. E 典型的一种题型. 简化后为非A既B.中文为不是A就是B, 没有考虑其它的可能性.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-4-30 23:04:00 | 只看该作者
答案十分正确!
地板
发表于 2003-5-1 00:03:00 | 只看该作者
2的问题是原文的逻辑. 一个结论是president's proposal is for the best interest of the nation.而原因是president showed great courage when advancing the proposal. 这里存在一个gap, 就是showing courage是不是可以等同于for the best interest of the nation. 如果词题为assumption, 答案很可能就是将这两个概念等同起来. 如果是问逻辑错误, 则答案说明两个概念不同, 既B.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-1 18:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部