ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1910|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全(44/63)第5题,百思不得其解,求教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-6-18 12:53:00 | 只看该作者

大全(44/63)第5题,百思不得其解,求教

Although much of this picture has been sustained by more recent research, it seems fundamentally wrong in one respect. Among the bacteria, there are organisms that are significantly different both from the cells of eukaryotes and from the true bacteria, and it now appears that there are three stems in the tree of life. New techniques for determining the molecular sequence of the RNA of organisms have produced evolutionary information about the degree to which organisms are related, the time since they diverged from a common ancestor, and the reconstruction of ancestral versions of genes. These techniques have strongly suggested that
                    although the true bacteria indeed form a large coherent group, certain other bacteria, the archaebacteria
                        
, which are also prokaryotes and which resemble true bacteria, represent a distinct evolutionary branch that far antedates the common ancestor of all true bacteria.

5.    If the “new techniques” mentioned in line 31 were applied in studies of biological classifications other than bacteria, which of the following is most likely?

(A) Some of those classifications will have to be reevaluated.

(B) Many species of bacteria will be reclassified.

(C) It will be determined that there are four main categories of living things rather than three.

(D) It will be found that true bacteria are much older than eukaryotes.A

(E) It will be found that there is a common ancestor of the eukaryotes, archaebacteria, and true bacteria.

想来想去不明白A是哪里推导出来的啊,文章中说来说去是关于bacteria,新技术 用在other than bacteria领域怎么能够随便就推导出来了呢?查了讨论区,没有本篇文章的讨论

请求大家给个思路

沙发
发表于 2015-3-16 22:55:58 | 只看该作者
It was once assumedthat all living thingscould be divided into twofundamental and exhaustive categories. Multicellularplants and animals, as well as manyunicellular organisms, are eukaryotic—their large, complex cells have a well-formed nucleusand many organelles. On the other hand, the true bacteriaare prokaryoticcell (prokaryoticcell: 原核细胞), which are simple and lack a nucleus. The distinctionbetween eukaryotesand bacteria,initially defined in terms of subcellularstructures(第7题d) visible with a microscope, was ultimately carried to the molecular level. Here prokaryotic and eukaryoticcells have manyfeatures in common. Forinstance, they translate genetic information into proteins according to the same type of genetic coding(第7题c)(第2题). But even where the molecular processes are thesame, the details in the two forms are different andcharacteristic of the respective forms. For example, the amino acid sequences of various enzymestend to be typically prokaryotic or eukaryotic(第7题e,这里的for example的位置应该是属于不同的,uniform是指统一的…). The differences between the groups andthe similarities within each group made it seem certain to mostbiologists that the tree of life had only two stems. Moreover, argumentspointing out the extent of both structural andfunctional differences between eukaryotes and true bacteria convincedmany biologists that the precursors of the eukaryotes must have diverged fromthe common ancestor before the bacteria arose.
生物的两种分类:1)euka 2)proka. 这两种有相同点+for instance. but转折后,提出这两种different and characteristic of the respectiveforms + for example.  然后,后面说the extentof both structural + functional differences.
Although much of this picturehas been sustained by more recent research, itseems fundamentally wrong in one respect. Among the bacteria, there are organisms that aresignificantly different both from the cells of eukaryotes and from the true bacteria, and it now appears that there are three stems in the treeof life. New techniques fordetermining the molecular sequence of the RNA of organisms(第4题) have produced evolutionaryinformation about the degree to which organisms are related, the time sincethey diverged from a common ancestor, and the reconstruction of ancestral versionsof genes. These techniques have strongly suggested that although thetrue bacteria indeed form a large coherent group, certain other bacteria, the archaebacteria (archaebacteria: [复] n.[微]原始细菌( 一种不同于细菌和动植物细胞且要求完全厌氧条件并能产生甲烷的微生物)), which are also prokaryotes and which resemble true bacteria,(第7题b) represent a distinctevolutionary branch that far antedates the common ancestor of all truebacteria.(第3题)
这里提出了第1段落可能错了,然后会有三种可能性。第三种可能性就是archae, 这个是proka,但又像bacteria


先看下全文的大的架构,就是粉色字部分。
然后看下题干:
If the “new techniques” mentioned in line31 were applied in studies of biological classifications other than bacteria,which of the following is most likely?    题干说如果new techniques用在biological classifications就是生物的分类上,那么以下那个最可能发生。定位new techniques:在第2段--->New techniques for determining the molecular sequence of the RNA of organisms(第4题) have produced evolutionary information about the degree to which organisms are related, the time since they diverged from a common ancestor, and the reconstruction of ancestral versions of genes. These techniques have strongly suggested that although the true bacteria indeed form a large coherent group, certain other bacteria, the archaebacteria, which are also prokaryotes and which resemble true bacteria,(第7题b) represent a distinct evolutionary branch that far antedates the common ancestor of all true bacteria.(第3题)

就是说用了这个new techniques, 分类里面就变成了三种可能性。所以对应A选项:Some of those classifications will have to be reevaluated.
those classifications应该指的是题干中(现存的)biological classifications, 就是分为两种,所以所现存的分成两种的这个情况have to be reevaluated,就是重新被看看,被评价评价。

以上是自己的一点浅见,如有高见请指明。谢谢啦~     


板凳
发表于 2020-8-14 23:18:24 | 只看该作者
这篇又错到怀疑人生,顺便翻译一下——

曾经所有活物被认为分为两种基本的和详尽的类别。多细胞植物和动物,有很多单细胞器官,叫做真核生物——他们大而复杂的细胞有一个构造很好的细胞核和很多细胞器。另一方面,真菌是原核细胞,他们很简单,而且没有细胞核。真核生物he原核生物的区别,最早被定义为显微镜下可见的亚细胞结构,最后被带到分子层面。这里真核生物和原核生物的细胞有很多相似点。比如,根据相似的遗传码翻译遗传信息到蛋白质。但是虽然分子过程是相同的,这两种生物的细节是不同的,具有各自的特征。比如,不同酶的氨基酸序列会标明是真核生物或原核生物。两组生物的不同点和相同点使大多数生物学家构建生命树只有两个分支。而且,声明指出真核生物和真菌结构和功能的不同,使很多生物学家认为真核生物的祖先(precursor 先驱,前导)在细菌出现之前一定已经从共同祖先分化出来。

虽然很多这种结论(picture翻译成了结论)被很多最近的研究保留了下来,但是它似乎从根本上的一点就错了。细菌是一种和真核生物的细胞和真菌的细胞都不相同的生物,并且它最近表现出生命树有三条分支。分析生物RNA分子顺序的新技术产生了一个关于生物体相关程度的革命性的信息,当他们从同一个祖先进化,并且重新构建最初版本的基因。这些技术强烈建议,虽然真菌确实组成了一个庞大而连续的群里,某些其他的细菌,原始细菌(也是一种原核生物,并且和真菌相似)代表了一个不同的发展分支,而且远早于所有真菌的所有祖先。
地板
发表于 2020-8-15 00:04:06 | 只看该作者
总结了一下错的点,这篇文章的题目都很tricky——
1.错选A,发现是A说反了,replace A with B,用B代替A,而原文应该是用三种分支代替两种分支。
4. 注意题目里的recently,明显应该第二段找答案,而第二段的方法只有RNA序列。
5.是真不会....
7.E选项改变一词整个意思都变了,原文说的是difference,选项E是uniform(统一)
8.语气词决定一切。开始觉得第二段反对很明显直接选了E,立马掉坑里了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-18 03:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部