It was once assumedthat all living thingscould be divided into twofundamental and exhaustive categories. Multicellularplants and animals, as well as manyunicellular organisms, are eukaryotic—their large, complex cells have a well-formed nucleusand many organelles. On the other hand, the true bacteriaare prokaryoticcell (prokaryoticcell: 原核细胞), which are simple and lack a nucleus. The distinctionbetween eukaryotesand bacteria,initially defined in terms of subcellularstructures(第7题d) visible with a microscope, was ultimately carried to the molecular level. Here prokaryotic and eukaryoticcells have manyfeatures in common. Forinstance, they translate genetic information into proteins according to the same type of genetic coding(第7题c)(第2题). But even where the molecular processes are thesame, the details in the two forms are different andcharacteristic of the respective forms. For example, the amino acid sequences of various enzymestend to be typically prokaryotic or eukaryotic(第7题e,这里的for example的位置应该是属于不同的,uniform是指统一的…). The differences between the groups andthe similarities within each group made it seem certain to mostbiologists that the tree of life had only two stems. Moreover, argumentspointing out the extent of both structural andfunctional differences between eukaryotes and true bacteria convincedmany biologists that the precursors of the eukaryotes must have diverged fromthe common ancestor before the bacteria arose. 生物的两种分类:1)euka 2)proka. 这两种有相同点+for instance. but转折后,提出这两种different and characteristic of the respectiveforms + for example. 然后,后面说the extentof both structural + functional differences. Although much of this picturehas been sustained by more recent research, itseems fundamentally wrong in one respect. Among the bacteria, there are organisms that aresignificantly different both from the cells of eukaryotes and from the true bacteria, and it now appears that there are three stems in the treeof life. New techniques fordetermining the molecular sequence of the RNA of organisms(第4题) have produced evolutionaryinformation about the degree to which organisms are related, the time sincethey diverged from a common ancestor, and the reconstruction of ancestral versionsof genes. These techniques have strongly suggested that although thetrue bacteria indeed form a large coherent group, certain other bacteria, the archaebacteria (archaebacteria: [复] n.[微]原始细菌( 一种不同于细菌和动植物细胞且要求完全厌氧条件并能产生甲烷的微生物)), which are also prokaryotes and which resemble true bacteria,(第7题b) represent a distinctevolutionary branch that far antedates the common ancestor of all truebacteria.(第3题) 这里提出了第1段落可能错了,然后会有三种可能性。第三种可能性就是archae, 这个是proka,但又像bacteria
先看下全文的大的架构,就是粉色字部分。
然后看下题干:
If the “new techniques” mentioned in line31 were applied in studies of biological classifications other than bacteria,which of the following is most likely? 题干说如果new techniques用在biological classifications就是生物的分类上,那么以下那个最可能发生。定位new techniques:在第2段--->New techniques for determining the molecular sequence of the RNA of organisms(第4题) have produced evolutionary information about the degree to which organisms are related, the time since they diverged from a common ancestor, and the reconstruction of ancestral versions of genes. These techniques have strongly suggested that although the true bacteria indeed form a large coherent group, certain other bacteria, the archaebacteria, which are also prokaryotes and which resemble true bacteria,(第7题b) represent a distinct evolutionary branch that far antedates the common ancestor of all true bacteria.(第3题)
就是说用了这个new techniques, 分类里面就变成了三种可能性。所以对应A选项:Some of those classifications will have to be reevaluated.
those classifications应该指的是题干中(现存的)biological classifications, 就是分为两种,所以所现存的分成两种的这个情况have to be reevaluated,就是重新被看看,被评价评价。
以上是自己的一点浅见,如有高见请指明。谢谢啦~
|