ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5400|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD6-5, 25

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-9 13:50:00 | 只看该作者

GWD6-5, 25

Q5 to Q7:


      According to a theory advanced


            by researcher Paul Martin, the wave


            of species extinctions that occurred


Line     in North America about 11,000 years


  (5)      ago, at the end of the Pleistocene era,


can be directly attributed to the arrival


of humans, i.e., the Paleoindians, who


were ancestors of modern Native


Americans.  However, anthropologist


(10)     Shepard Krech points out that large


animal species vanished even in areas


where there is no evidence to demon-


strate that Paleoindians hunted them.


Nor were extinctions confined to large


(15)     animals:  small animals, plants, and


insects disappeared, presumably not


all through human consumption.  Krech


also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of


climatic change as an explanation by


(20)     asserting that widespread climatic


            change did indeed occur at the end of


            the Pleistocene.  Still, Krech attributes


secondary if not primary responsibility


for the extinctions to the Paleoindians,


(25)     arguing that humans have produced


local extinctions elsewhere.  But,


according to historian Richard White,


even the attribution of secondary


responsibility may not be supported


(30)     by the evidence.  White observes that


Martin’s thesis depends on coinciding


dates for the arrival of humans and the


            decline of large animal species, and


Krech, though aware that the dates


(35)     are controversial, does not challenge


them; yet recent archaeological


discoveries are providing evidence


that the date of human arrival was


much earlier than 11,000 years ago.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q5:


Which of the following is true about Martin’s theory, as that theory is described in the passage?


                        



  • It assumes that the Paleoindians were primarily dependent on hunting for survival.

  • It denies that the Pleistocene species extinctions were caused by climate change.

  • It uses as evidence the fact that humans have produced local extinctions in other situations.

  • It attempts to address the controversy over the date of human arrival in North America.

  • It admits the possibility that factors other than the arrival of humans played a role in the Pleistocene extinctions.


  • Answer: b



    why not A?



    Q23 to Q26:


          Diamonds are almost impos-


                sible to detect directly because they


                are so rare:  very rich kimberlite


    Line     pipes, the routes through which


      (5)      diamonds rise, may contain only


    three carats of diamonds per ton


    of kimberlite.  Kimberlite begins as


    magma in Earth’s mantle (the layer


    between the crust and the core).  As


    (10)     the magma smashes through layers


    of rock, it rips out debris, creating


    a mix of liquid and solid material.


    Some of the solid material it brings


    up may come from a so-called


    (15)     diamond-stability field, where condi-


    tions of pressure and temperature


    are conducive to the formation of


    diamonds.  If diamonds are to sur-


    vive, though, they must shoot toward


    (20)     Earth’s surface quickly.  Otherwise,


                they revert to graphite or burn.


                Explorers seeking diamonds look


    for specks of “indicator minerals”


    peculiar to the mantle but carried up


    (25)     in greater quantities than diamonds


    and eroded out of kimberlite pipes


    into the surrounding land.  The stan-


    dard ones are garnets, chromites,


    and ilmenites.  One can spend years


    (30)     searching for indicators and tracing


    them back to the pipes that are their


    source; however, 90 percent of


                kimberlite pipes found this way are


    barren of diamonds, and the rest


    (35)    are usually too sparse to mine.


          In the 1970’s the process of


    locating profitable pipes was refined


    by focusing on the subtle differ-


    ences between the chemical


    (40)    signatures of indicator minerals


    found in diamond-rich pipes as


    opposed to those found in barren


    pipes.  For example, G10 garnets,


    a type of garnet typically found in


    (45)     diamond-rich pipes, are lower in


    calcium and higher in chrome than


    garnets from barren pipes.  Geo-


    chemists John Gurney showed that


    garnets with this composition were


    (50)     formed only in the diamond-stability


    field; more commonly found ver-


    sions came from elsewhere in the


    mantle.  Gurney also found that


    though ilmenites did not form in the


    (55)     diamond-stability field, there was a


    link useful for prospectors:  when


    the iron in ilmenite was highly


    oxidized, its source pipe rarely


    contained any diamonds.  He rea-


    (60)     soned that iron took on more or less


    oxygen in response to conditions in


    the kimberlitic magma itself—mainly


    in response to heat and the avail-


    able oxygen.  When iron became


    (65)     highly oxidized, so did diamonds;


    that is, they vaporized into carbon


    dioxide.



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Q25:


    The passage suggests that the presence of G10 garnet in a kimberlite pipe indicates that


                            



  • the pipe in which the garnet is found has a 90% chance of containing diamonds

  • the levels of calcium and chrome in the pipe are conducive to diamond formation

  • the pipe passed through a diamond-stability field and thus may contain diamonds

  • any diamonds the pipe contains would not have come from the diamond-stability field

  • the pipe’s temperature was so high that it oxidized any diamonds the pipe might have contained

  • Answer:  b


    why not C?



    沙发
    发表于 2004-7-9 16:05:00 | 只看该作者
    Geo-

    chemists John Gurney showed that

    garnets with this composition were

    (50)     formed only in the diamond-stability

    field

    板凳
    发表于 2004-7-9 17:27:00 | 只看该作者
    以下是引用ivy2004gmat在2004-7-9 15:45:00的发言:

    But question is "


    The passage suggests that the presence of G10 garnet in a kimberlite pipe indicates that"


    so answer mentioning " the levels of calcium and chrome in the pipe" do make sense.


    what's wrong with B?

    我认为:虽然G10是在pipe当中,但pipe可能含有很多各种各样的成分,所以:the levels of calcium and chrome in the G10 garnet不等于the levels of calcium and chrome in the pipe。
    [此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-9 17:35:31编辑过]
    地板
    发表于 2004-7-10 10:50:00 | 只看该作者

    6-5 定位在这里;

    Krech

    also contradicts Martin’s exclusion of

    climatic change as an explanation by

    (20)     asserting that

    A. the passage mentions nothing about how Paleoindian lived

    5#
    发表于 2008-4-22 20:49:00 | 只看该作者
    恩,明白;了,谢谢!!
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-22 11:31
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部