ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1535|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

feifei-82

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-12-1 18:00:00 | 只看该作者

feifei-82

82. Every photograph, because it involves the light rays that something emits hitting film, must in some obvious sense be true. But because it could always have been made to show things differently than it does, it cannot express the whole truth and, in that sense, is false. Therefore, nothing can ever be definitively proved with a photograph.

 

Which one of the following is an assumption that would permit the conclusion above to be properly drawn?

 

A.        Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth cannot furnish definitive proof.

B.        The whole truth cannot be known.

C.        It is not possible to determine the truthfulness of a photograph in any sense.

D.       It is possible to use a photograph as corroborative evidence if there is additional evidence establishing the truth about the scene photographed.

E    If something is being photographed, then it is possible to prove definitively the truth about it.

A怎么理解,我怎么找不到主谓宾?

沙发
发表于 2007-12-2 01:27:00 | 只看该作者
顶!我倒能分出主谓宾,主语是那个WHAT引导的从句,that it cannot express the whole truth修饰SENSE,cannot furnish definitive proof是谓语和宾语,但意思我理解不了,模模糊糊觉得好像是:在那个不能显示出全部真相的sense里面错误的东西不能提供确定的证明,但我理不出清楚地思路,请问答案是A 吗?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-12-3 15:45:00 | 只看该作者

答案是A

地板
发表于 2007-12-3 22:19:00 | 只看该作者

昨天讨论过了。答案是A.

5#
发表于 2007-12-4 10:31:00 | 只看该作者

Whatever is false in the sense that it cannot express the whole truth
                    cannot furnish definitive proof.

 

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 06:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部