ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1064|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]关于FEIFEI85题,请多指教.

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-8 01:33:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]关于FEIFEI85题,请多指教.

我主要是有1个地方不解,在反对1970的法案的时候,这个时间点,应该是1970年左右吧,而在1967年,就有了科技能解决这个问题. 为什么制造商还会说,技术上无法做到呢.

难道1970法案,不是代表1970年制定的法案,而是比如说1965,1966年制定了一个1970法案, 这样好像也不太好理解啊.

就像现在,2007年, 中国会制定一个关于环保的2010的法案么? 总之觉得有些别扭.请多多执教,非常感谢.

In opposing the 1970 Clean Air Act, the United States automobile industry argued that meeting the act’s standards for automobile emissions was neither economically feasible nor environmentally necessary. However, the catalytic converter, invented in 1967, enabled automakers to meet the 1970 standards efficiently. Currently, automakers are lobbying against the government’s attempt to pass legislation that would tighten restrictions on automobile emissions. The automakers contend that these new restrictions would be overly expensive and unnecessary to efforts to curb air pollution. Clearly, the automobile industry’s position should not be heeded.

85. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the method used to counter the automakers’ current position?

(A) The automakers’ premises are shown to lead to a contradiction.

(B) Facts are mentioned that show that the automakers are relying on false information.

(C) A flaw is pointed out in the reasoning used by the automakers to reach their conclusion.

(D) A comparison is drawn between the automakers’ current position and a position they held in the past.

(E) Evidence is provided that the new emissions legislation is both economically feasible and environmentally necessary.

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-4-8 01:55:00 | 只看该作者
睡觉了,大家晚安
板凳
发表于 2009-7-24 22:11:00 | 只看该作者
DING
地板
发表于 2009-8-5 05:12:00 | 只看该作者
D
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-10 00:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部