[讨论]og75的解释大家不觉得有主观的嫌疑吗

75. Which of the following best completes the passage below?

The more worried investors are about losing their money, the more they will demand a high potential return on their investment; great risks must be offset by the chance of great rewards. This principle is the fundamental one in determining interest rates, and it is illustrated by the fact that——.

(A) successful investors are distinguished by an ability to make very risky investments without worrying about their money

(B) lenders receive higher interest rates on unsecured loans than on loans backed by collateral

(C) in times of high inflation, the interest paid to depositors by banks can actually be below the rate of inflation

(D) at any one time, a commercial bank will have a single rate of interest that it will expect all of its individual borrowers to pay
            B

(E) the potential return on investment in a new company is typically lower than the potential return on investment in a well-established company
            

75.

Since an unsecured loan is more risky, from the lender’s point of view, than a loan baked by collateral, the fact that lenders receive higher interest rates for unsecured loans is an illustration of the principle outlined in the passage. Thus, choice B is the best answer.

None of the other choices gives a clear instance in which increased risk is compensated by the potential for increased return. Choice A does not concern return on investment at all. Choice C is an instance of low return unrelated to risk. In choice D, contrary to the principle, the rate of return remains constant despite possible variations in risk, and choice E also runs counter to the principle if investments in well-established companies entail less risk.

这题我做对了,但对OG中对E的解释不是很理解."E also runs counter to the principle if investments in well-established companies entail less risk."OG认为E与题目原则背道而驰.仿佛well-established companies就不应该有高回报似的.我想我做对这题是因为对B比较了解,相信也有人是这样做对的.但实际上对E的排除充足的理由是什么呢?请讨论.

贴不下,继续----

75.

Since an unsecured loan is more risky, from the lender’s point of view, than a loan baked by collateral, the fact that lenders receive higher interest rates for unsecured loans is an illustration of the principle outlined in the passage. Thus, choice B is the best answer.

None of the other choices gives a clear instance in which increased risk is compensated by the potential for increased return. Choice A does not concern return on investment at all. Choice C is an instance of low return unrelated to risk. In choice D, contrary to the principle, the rate of return remains constant despite possible variations in risk, and choice E also runs counter to the principle if investments in well-established companies entail less risk.

这题我做对了,但对E的解释,认为E与题目原则背道而驰有主观之嫌,难道well-establish companies 就天生应该低回报似的.之所以选B是出于对银行贷款高的中国行情的了解,不知大家是怎么理解E的,如何用充分的理由排除E呢.

继续---

choice E also runs counter to the principle if investments in well-established companies entail less risk.

这题答案选B,我做对了.但E的解释似乎有主观之嫌,难道well-established companies 就一定要高回报吗.

这题我做对B是出于对中国国情贷款利率高的了解.但对E的排除有充分的理由吗?我找不出来

open to discuss.

感觉E是个不相关，而且可以说是说反了的答案啊。

E说新公司的预期回报率低，而well establish的相对高

正常情况下，新公司风险高而well establish的低，那根据前面的意思说风险高的回报相对高啊，那E不是就说反了。是这个意思么？