偶的愚见 In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities. Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT: (A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.(难道伦敦的air-pollution problems almost entirely by local industry,文中没说呀) (B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.(significant impact对应increased dramatically) (C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.(air-pollution regulations要发挥作用,运用的前提条件要相同:譬如地理位置,盛行风之类的) (D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable. (增长是可预期的。就是别把死马当活马医) (E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area (部分的增长的确能够代替整体的增长。不要看见的多啦,没看见的都死光啦,也没用呀) |