oldprep-cr2-65

lmf0801 · 发表于 2010-12-18 18:35:53

65.(34047-!-item-!-188;#058&007611)

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease.Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population.Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.

Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?

(A) The many fatal strokes and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.

(B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.

(C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be dominant.

(D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure early diagnosis are costly.

(E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures of this kind.

lmf0801 · 发表于 2010-12-21 09:39:03

tintinc · 发表于 2011-3-11 05:21:23

A选得出。可是看到C我瞬间心动了。。。

低调进步 · 发表于 2011-7-24 20:06:31

谁能给把A选项解释一下呢感谢?!

jxgzcly · 发表于 2011-8-17 17:28:03

A,意识就说,没有预防P的治疗花费很多,而且还有其他的花费~ 削弱原文说,不够经济~

C,说的是,经济问题在健康问题面前,不是问题. 也就是,老子要命不要钱~ 这个脱离了文章讨论的问题.文章要你削弱不经济,你直接把出题者给枪毙了.这怎么行呢?

脱离了削弱主逻辑线的范围. 预防P ---不经济~

nesstang · 发表于 2011-10-31 21:08:34

The many fatal strokes and heart attacks resulting from untreated hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses of other sorts.
a的选项说的是，许多由未经治疗的高血压导致的致命中风和心脏疾病花费的医疗费用虽然很少，但是会到产生其他类型的巨大经济损失。
额，我理解的是，人要得中风或心脏病死了，花费的医疗费用确实少。但是从其他经济角度来看，人命的损失是中巨大的经济浪费。

米米时代007 · 发表于 2012-2-3 12:13:49

Treatment for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and heart disease.Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population.Therefore, there is no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.
开始不理解第二句话，required to treat the hypertensive population，并没有说是心脏病，反倒很有可能是treatment for hypertension，那省四分之一的钱省得也是treat for hypertension的钱，怎么会和心脏病中风的治疗费用有关系呢？

安徽民工 · 发表于 2012-2-4 16:02:34

C扯的有点远了。

oldprep-cr2-65

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()