ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4115|回复: 36
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day194

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2023-4-23 00:43:51 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
想带着大家每天坚持读逻辑,就拿来Source为鸡精的逻辑真题,每天带着大家打卡,希望大家能坚持每天学习+逻辑打卡;
大家可以在有限时间内阅读并分析逻辑链,本帖回复结构和猜测的答案方向,可以看看谁猜的准!大家都是大侦探!
每日的答案和结构在揽瓜阁逻辑群中更新
揽瓜阁逻辑群加群方式在本文末尾
考试群:
GMAT入群/揽瓜阁入群方式:https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1382779-1-1.html
揽瓜阁阅读精读(读什么文章,大家读过就懂了):
公众号:1.考什么试
2.商校百科
申请群
1. ChaseDream 2023 MBA 申请/校友答疑/面试群:
2.英国,新加坡,美国,法国,加拿大,香港,德国商科申请群:
3. 行业分享交流/职业规划群:
小红书:
1.留学+考试 最新消息 关注妥妥妥了 (小红书号:323014154)
2.求职+MBA 最新消息 关注元(小红书号:895404330)
朋友们!揽瓜阁逻辑小分队重新上线啦~每日材料我们仍旧会发布在ChaseDream GMAT 逻辑版块。
为了响应大家想拉群专门讨论2022揽瓜阁逻辑的要求,我们设立了小范围的打卡群(仅针对确定会打卡的同学),现作出揽瓜阁逻辑2022打卡群入群流程如下:
1.完成小分队任意三日的逻辑打卡任务(需回帖并截图),指路:https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1388800-1-1.html
2.向小蓝鸡发送关键字:【揽瓜阁逻辑2022】并附上三次任务截图后耐心等待入群即可。
3. 本次小分队活动为纯公益性活动,为了督促大家学习,采取严格的打卡审查制度,连续三日不打卡的朋友会被无情清退。
⚠️重要提醒:如您还不是GMAT交流群群友,请先申请进入GMAT交流群后再申请进入揽瓜阁逻辑2022打卡群
最新鸡麦群入口:
手机微信打开或者电脑网页打开均可,记得一定要登录再填,无需跳转APP
Day 194
1.        Shopping mall
某个镇的Shopping mall square excluded some convenience stores out of the mall, the residents surrounding the shopping mall attributed the traffic, loud noise and garbage, to the shopping mall's decision to close these stores. However, it is not caused by the closing of these convenience stores since all these stores excluded from shopping mall did not open new stores in surrounding area. which of the following weakens the argument…


2.        Free voucher
One provincial government gives free vouchers to the government agencies and some companies. but companies always sell some of their vouchers to the government agencies, accordingly, the vouchers issued by the government 怎么这么着了…
问你如果上面是正确的,则下面哪个can be inferred?


3.        垃圾回收部门取缔
市政府决定取消垃圾回收部门,然后分包给一些公司去做,这样政府付的钱比较少,而且居民的满意度也提高了,市政发言人说这是因为提高了竞争的原因…
问assumption…

收藏收藏1 收藏收藏1
沙发
发表于 2023-4-23 09:13:59 | 只看该作者
同意!               
板凳
发表于 2023-4-23 14:00:06 | 只看该作者
某个镇的Shopping mall square excluded some conveniencestores out of the mall, the residents surrounding the shopping mall attributedthe traffic, loud noise and garbage, to the shopping mall's decision to closethese stores. However, it is not caused by the closing of these conveniencestores since all these stores excluded from shopping mall did not open newstores in surrounding area. which of the following weakens the argument…

因为他们要搬走啊,要拆卸,肯定吵

2.       Free voucher
One provincialgovernment gives free vouchers to the government agencies and some companies.but companies always sell some of their vouchers to the government agencies,accordingly, the vouchers issued by the government 怎么这么着了…
问你如果上面是正确的,则下面哪个can be inferred?

Gov的agency持有的比原本给他们发的要多??

3.       垃圾回收部门取缔
市政府决定取消垃圾回收部门,然后分包给一些公司去做,这样政府付的钱比较少,而且居民的满意度也提高了,市政发言人说这是因为提高了竞争的原因…
问assumption…
提高竞争就会让这些公司愿意接这些活,而且价钱也会压低,效率不会降低?
地板
发表于 2023-4-23 16:55:35 发自手机 Web 版 | 只看该作者
Day 194
1.        Shopping mall
某个镇的Shopping mall square excluded some convenience stores out of the mall, the residents surrounding the shopping mall attributed the traffic, loud noise and garbage, to the shopping mall's decision to close these stores. However, it is not caused by the closing of these convenience stores since all these stores excluded from shopping mall did not open new stores in surrounding area. which of the following weakens the argument…
【逻辑链】因为便利店都选择不开新店,只有商场新开在附近--》附近便利店关门削弱:
-因为新开商场更便宜新鲜,便利店才开不下去

2.        Free voucher
One provincial government gives free vouchers to the government agencies and some companies. but companies always sell some of their vouchers to the government agencies, accordingly, the vouchers issued by the government 怎么这么着了…
问你如果上面是正确的,则下面哪个can be inferred?
【演绎推理】
消费券一定会经过政府机构这一环节

3.        垃圾回收部门取缔
市政府决定取消垃圾回收部门,然后分包给一些公司去做,这样政府付的钱比较少,而且居民的满意度也提高了,市政发言人说这是因为提高了竞争的原因…
问assumption…
【逻辑链】取消垃圾回收部门,分包--》政府付钱少,居民满意度高
假设:分包出去的活质量不会下降,不影响居民满意度
-分包出去的价格更便宜
5#
发表于 2023-4-23 18:41:25 | 只看该作者
1. P all these stores excluded from shopping mall did not open new stores in surrounding area
C  it is not caused by the closing of these convenience stores
导致商场关闭convenience stores的其他原因

2. 政府给 agencies&公司 vouchers
公司把vouchers卖给agencies所以最后vouchers都到了agencies手上?

3. 猜测方向:公司接管垃圾回收部门没有提高居民处理垃圾的费用

                  市场上有很多垃圾处理公司




6#
发表于 2023-4-23 18:58:14 | 只看该作者
day 194
1.P: 居民认为商场关闭商店是由于交通、噪音和垃圾
C: 但这些商店并没有重开
weaken:关闭商店造成交通、噪音和垃圾问题

2.P: 政府发放凭证给公司
C: 公司总是回售凭证给政府
推断:凭证解决公司资金问题

3.P: 政府外包垃圾处理, 居民很满意
C: 政府认为这样提高竞争
假设:竞争带来效益提高
7#
发表于 2023-4-23 19:50:31 | 只看该作者
同意!               
8#
发表于 2023-4-23 20:06:27 | 只看该作者
Day 194
1.        Shopping mall
某个镇的Shopping mall square excluded some convenience stores out of the mall, the residents surrounding the shopping mall attributed the traffic, loud noise and garbage, to the shopping mall's decision to close these stores. However, it is not caused by the closing of these convenience stores since all these stores excluded from shopping mall did not open new stores in surrounding area. which of the following weakens the argument…
答:连带原因,没有开附近,但是开在一个地点(这个地点使得其他人取便利店时,必须经过这个小区中转)

2.        Free voucher
One provincial外省地government gives free vouchers to the government agencies and some companies. but companies always sell some of their vouchers to the government agencies, accordingly, the vouchers issued by the government 怎么这么着了…
问你如果上面是正确的,则下面哪个can be inferred?
答:companies成本0;有关agencies成本增加


3.        垃圾回收部门取缔
市政府决定取消垃圾回收部门,然后分包给一些公司去做,这样政府付的钱比较少,而且居民的满意度也提高了,市政发言人说这是因为提高了竞争的原因…
问assumption…

答:竞争 确实→分包公司工作好
9#
发表于 2023-4-23 22:40:10 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
10#
发表于 2023-4-23 23:09:44 | 只看该作者
打卡
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-25 17:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部