ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1514|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教04年6月的一些不懂问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-9-18 10:13:00 | 只看该作者

请教04年6月的一些不懂问题

Jun 04:

A section(RC): 4) C 为何不对. 8) D 在文中哪里有对应; 21) C为什么不对

B section (LR): 14) 为什么是C; 15) 为什么是D

C section (LR): 25) C哪里不对

若版里有做过这些题的朋友并且知道Kaplan讲解的, 还望解答. 多谢帮助

沙发
发表于 2007-9-18 18:25:00 | 只看该作者

把题贴上来吧

板凳
发表于 2007-9-18 22:08:00 | 只看该作者

14. Resident: Residents of this locale should not consider
their loss of farming as a way of life to be a
tragedy. When this area was a rural area it was
economically depressed, but it is now a growing
bastion of high-tech industry with high-wage
jobs, and supports over 20 times the number of
jobs it did then.
Which one of the following, if true, does the most to
justify the conclusion of the resident’s argument?
(A) Farming is becoming increasingly efficient, with
the result that fewer farms are required to
produce the same amount of food.
(B) The development of high-tech industry is more
valuable to national security than is farming.
(C) Residents of this locale do not value a rural way
of life more than they value economic
prosperity.
(D) Many residents of this locale have annual
incomes that are twice what they were when
the locale was primarily agricultural.
(E) The loss of a family farm is often perceived as
tragic even when no financial hardship results.

PREMISE:high-wage jobs, and supports over 20 times the number of jobs it did then

CONCLUSION:not consider their loss of farming as a way of life to be a tragedy

D为无关答案.

地板
发表于 2007-9-18 22:16:00 | 只看该作者

15. Kendrick: Governments that try to prevent cigarettes
from being advertised are justified in doing so,
since such advertisements encourage people to
engage in an unhealthy practice. But cigarette
advertisements should remain legal since
advertisements for fatty foods are legal, even
though those advertisements also encourage
people to engage in unhealthy practices.
Which one of the following, if true, most helps to
resolve the apparent conflict between Kendrick’s
statements?
(A) Any advertisement that encourages people to
engage in an unhealthy practice should be
made illegal, even though the legality of some
such advertisements is currently
uncontroversial.
(B) The advertisement of fattening foods, unlike that
of cigarettes, should not be prevented, because
fattening foods, unlike cigarettes, are not
addictive.
(C) Most advertisements should be legal, although
advertisers are always morally responsible for
ensuring that their advertisements do not
encourage people to engage in unhealthy
practices.
(D) Governments should try to prevent the
advertisement of cigarettes by means of
financial disincentives rather than by legal
prohibition.
(E) Governments should place restrictions on
cigarette advertisements so as to keep them
from encouraging people to engage in
unhealthy practices, but should not try to
prevent such advertisements.

文中说政府应该阻止香烟广告;但同时香烟广告又是合法的,就象含增肥物质的食品广告合法一样.题目让解决此文中的矛盾.

D说政府应采用经济手段组织香烟广告,而不是以法律方式禁止.

5#
发表于 2007-9-18 22:27:00 | 只看该作者

25. Wealth is not a good thing, for good things cause no
harm at all, yet wealth is often harmful to people.
Which one of the following arguments is most similar
in its pattern of reasoning to the argument above?
(A) Alex loves to golf, and no one in the chess club
loves to golf. It follows that Alex is not in the
chess club.
(B) Isabella must be a contented baby. She smiles a
great deal and hardly ever cries, like all happy
people.
(C) Growth in industry is not a good thing for our
town. Although the economy might improve,
the pollution would be unbearable.
(D) Sarah’s dog is not a dachshund, for he hunts
very well, and most dachshunds hunt poorly.
(E) There is usually more traffic at this time of day,
unless it is a holiday. But since today is not a
holiday, it is surprising that there is so little
traffic.

1) good things cause no harm at all, 2) yet wealth is often harmful to people 3)Wealth is not a good thing

1) no one in the chess club loves to golf. 2) Alex loves to golf, 
 3) Alex is not in the chess club.

6#
发表于 2007-9-19 01:19:00 | 只看该作者
LG 14,Conclusion 是RESIDENTS should not take this change as a TRAGEDY. 如选项C所述的价值观,则自然residents都不会视这种变化为tragedy. 但D涉及的只是MANY residents,这些人变得再好,但如果别的全部人都变得更差呢?凭什么他们不能视这种变化为tragedy呢?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 23:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部