这道题讲什么啊，晕

The following proposal to amend the bylaws of an organization was circulated to its members for comment. When more than one nominee is to be named for an office, prospective nominees must consent to nomination and before giving such consent must be told who the other nominees will be.

which of the following comments concerning the logic of the proposal is accurate if it can not be known who the actual nominees are until prospective nominees have given their consent to be nominated?

a. The proposal would make it possible for each of several nominees for an office to be aware of who all of the other nominees are.

b.The proposal would widen the choice available to those choosing among the nominees.

c.If there are several prospective nominees, the proposal would deny the last nominee equal treatment with the first.

d.The proposal would enable a prospective nominee to withdraw from competition with a specific person whithout making that withdrawal known.

e.if there is more than one prospective onminee, the proposal would make it impossible for anyone to become a nominee.

correct answer choice: e

题目大意是有一个议案：当一个办公室有超过一个人被提名，那么那个提名的人必须同意提名。在同意提名之前必须要知道其他被提名的人。

那么这个议案是否是合乎正确的逻辑的呢。

首先我认为这个议案本身有矛盾。所有被提名人在同意提名前还要知道其他被提名的人，那么结果就是不可能有任何一个人同意。因为无法知道被提名的其他人。所以选E

总算想通了，谢谢