ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1392|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]大全-16-2. 看了讨论依然不懂

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-15 11:48:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]大全-16-2. 看了讨论依然不懂

大全-16-2.      The reason much refrigerated food spoils is that it ends up out of sight at the back of the shelf. So why not have round shelves that rotate? Because such rotating shelves would have just the same sort of drawback, since things would fall off the shelves’ edges into the rear corners.

Which of the following is presupposed in the argument against introducing rotating shelves?

(A) Refrigerators would not be made so that their interior space is cylindrical.

(B) Refrigerators would not be made to have a window in front for easy viewing of their contents without opening the door.

(C) The problem of spoilage of refrigerated food is not amenable to any solution based on design changes.

(D) Refrigerators are so well designed that there are bound to be drawbacks to any design change.A

(E) Rotating shelves would be designed to rotate only while the refrigerator door was open.

这个题,我仔细看了CD上的讨论但是还是不懂啊55555

我选的是C  也不太懂A的意思,

如果冰箱内壳是正方体 里面是圆形架子 东西当然会掉下去

如果冰箱内壳是圆柱体,圆形架子怎么不可以呢,

难道题目的意思是不能改变冰箱内壳的形状????

沙发
发表于 2007-4-15 20:58:00 | 只看该作者
you got it!
板凳
发表于 2007-9-14 16:34:00 | 只看该作者

A means the interior spaces of Refrigerators can't be made to be cylindrical.If the interior spaces can't be cylindrical,you introduce a rotating shelfs, food will drop from the edge of the shelf into the rear corners.

Refrigerators would not be made so (that their interior space is cylindrical).

I did wrong answer too.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-6 07:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部