ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

With a record number of new companies starting up in Derderia, and with previously established companies adding many new jobs, a record number of new jobs were created last year in the Derderian economy. This year, previously established companies will not be adding as many new jobs overall as such companies added last year. Therefore, unless a record number of companies start up this year, Derderia will not break its record for new jobs created.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2061|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 22 13一道真正的逻辑题!!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-9-23 20:15:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 22 13一道真正的逻辑题!!!

Q13:

With a record number of new companies starting up in Derderia, and with previously established companies adding many new jobs, a record number of new jobs were created last year in the Derderian economy.  This year, previously established companies will not be adding as many new jobs overall as such companies added last year.  Therefore, unless a record number of companies start up this year, Derderia will not break its record for new jobs created.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?

 

  1. In a given year, new companies starting up create more new jobs on average than do previously established companies.

  2. The number of people seeking employment is no larger this year than it was last year.

  3. This year, the new companies starting up will not provide substantially more jobs per company than did new companies last year.

  4. Previously established companies in Derderia will be less profitable this year than such companies were last year.
  5. The number of jobs created in the Derderian economy last year was substantially larger than the number of jobs lost.

答案选C,什么逻辑呀?请高手指点指点~~~完全想不通~~谢谢

沙发
发表于 2007-9-23 20:40:00 | 只看该作者

文章说去年成立和之前已经成立的公司不会提供很多的工作机会,所以只有增加今年成立公司的数量来提供工作机会

但是没有考虑,如果今年公司成立的数量不多,但是每个今年的新公司提供的工作数量多的话,也就没有必要今年成立很多的新公司

C是对第二段的取非排除。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-9-23 20:44:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢了~~~

地板
发表于 2007-9-24 10:56:00 | 只看该作者

请问一下怎么理解这句话“This year, previously established companies will not be adding as many new jobs overall as such companies added last year. 

去年新成立的公司今年是否就转化为 previously established 了?

5#
发表于 2007-9-24 14:25:00 | 只看该作者

number of new jobs 来自两方面的贡献,A部分来自previously established companies ,B部分来自new companies starting up 。原文中对两年中A、B总和以及A部分分别做了比较,为了使A+B的比较成立,需要补充A部分的比较信息,即为C答案内容。

原文最后一句话虽然提及number of companies start up this year,但是我们关心的是这些公司带来的new job的数量,而不是这些公司的数量。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-29 03:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部