这道题有点难,大家来看看

anjjule · 发表于 2011-10-25 19:11:54

Some environmentalists question the prudence of
exploiting features of the environment, arguing that
there are no economic benefits to be gained from
forests, mountains, or wetlands that no longer exist.
Many environmentalists claim that because nature
has intrinsic value it would be wrong to destroy such
features of the environment, even if the economic
costs of doing so were outweighed by the economic
costs of not doing so

Which one of the following can be logically inferred
from the passage?

(A) It is economically imprudent to exploit features
of the environment.
(B) Some environmentalists appeal to a
noneconomic justification in questioning the
defensibility of exploiting features of the
environment.
(C) Most environmentalists appeal to economic
reasons in questioning the defensibility of
exploiting features of the environment.
(D) Many environmentalists provide only a
noneconomic justification in questioning the
defensibility of exploiting features of the
environment.
(E) Even if there is no economic reason for
protecting the environment, there is a sound
noneconomic justification for doing so

是POWERSCORE上的,虽然有解体思路,还是不太明确题干所传达的逻辑信息,请高人来指点下题干的意思,谢谢.

miffyhui · 发表于 2012-6-4 13:46:13

up up up~~求指点！不明白

miffyhui · 发表于 2012-6-4 14:11:44

求牛牛解释！！

miffyhui · 发表于 2012-6-5 09:27:38

安然向人 · 发表于 2012-6-5 09:40:42

是不是选D？

安然向人 · 发表于 2012-6-5 09:43:56

哦不对选B

安然向人 · 发表于 2012-6-5 09:50:32

问的是INFER从文中能得出啥
SIMPLY FUCK ALL THE NEW INFO。。。。
P1：一些环境主义者从经济学角度质疑了开发环境资源的严谨性
P2：很多（MANY可看做ALL）又从自然的内在属性（非经济学角度）质疑了开发环境资源的严谨性，即使不开发的成本大于开发的成本
A ：是SOME E的说法，不是IT IS
B:对 MANY>SOME
C:是SOME不是MOST
D:ONLY错，文中得不出是不是ONLY
E：改为FOR NOT DOING SO

miffyhui · 发表于 2012-6-5 13:08:26

题干整个的意思都是反对开发利用的吧？开始没怎么理清，以为前者是支持开发，后者反对开发，糊涂了！
对于题目里面出现prudence，选项里面出现的defensibility，这样的抽象词不是特别理解，在对题干信息转换时，存在困难，请问有什么办法能解决？

doreen125 · 发表于 2012-6-5 14:27:27

其实我有点不太明白题干的意思呢，b的中文意思是什么呢？
虽然根据关键词选了b，但是乍一眼看上去觉得b选项是对于第一句话的另外一种说法。
但是题目的要求是要通过以上段落得出了什么样的结论，所以有一点费解。不知道能不能解释一下我的疑惑呢？

安然向人 · 发表于 2012-6-5 17:10:04

其实我有点不太明白题干的意思呢，b的中文意思是什么呢？
虽然根据关键词选了b，但是乍一眼看上去觉得b选项是对于第一句话的另外一种说法。
但是题目的要求是要通过以上段落得出了什么样的结论，所以有一点费解。不知道能不能解释一下我的疑惑呢？

-- by 会员 doreen125 (2012/6/5 14:27:27)

不是结论是INFER，问题中哪里有CONCLUSION？？？
骚年你要英文思维啊不要老想翻译成中文。

B是第二句话的另一种说法

哎其实就是文中说了啥.不能扩大范围，可以缩小；不能太绝对。

B:Some environmentalists appeal to a
noneconomic justification in questioning the
defensibility of exploiting features of the
environment.

B: 一些环境保护主义者通过非经济学角度（经济学角度是获利，那么取非就是不获利+亏损）质疑了对环境资源开发的辩护，是反对开发。

this is nothing but the paraphrase version of the premise 2:

Many environmentalists claim that because nature
has intrinsic value it would be wrong to destroy such
features of the environment, even if the economic
costs of doing so were outweighed by the economic
costs of not doing so(与经济角度相反。)

文中第二个PREMISE说了很多很多很多环境者声称因为自然的内在价值，破坏环境（开发资源）是错误的，即便是不开发的成本大于开发的成本。

“很多很多很多” 大于 “一些”，所以选B

the stimulus says MANY object the Gov's defense from a non-economic view( the intrinsic value of nature),
B says SOME environmentists did so.
MANY>Some , correct

遇到范围修辞多的题，或者百分比和真数的题，MANY ，SOME， NONE什么的，实在昏了，画个韦恩图吧。。。

这道题有点难,大家来看看

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()