ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1165|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助 狒狒逻辑宝典 62

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-12-9 12:33:00 | 只看该作者

求助 狒狒逻辑宝典 62

62. Brushing your teeth regularly no matter which toothpaste you use, will reduce your chances of tooth decay. 
Scientists have concluded that, when you brush, you reduce tooth decay by removing the film of plaque that forms on teeth and gums. 
So, you can forget about fluorides: brush your teeth carefully and say goodbye to cavities. 

 

Which one of the following is a criticism of the reasoning in the argument? 

 

A.        Brushing with fluoride toothpaste has been shown to reduce tooth decay. 

B.        The fact that brushing will reduce tooth decay does not show that fluorides are of no value. 

C.       Few people adequately remove plaque by brushing. 

D.       People have plaque on their teeth most of the time. 

E.        Scientists have been wrong about fluorides. 
我觉得题目是问削弱reasoning的,reason应该是you reduce tooth decay by removing the film of plaque that forms on teeth and gums. 吧。所以答案B是对结果
So, you can forget about fluorides: brush your teeth carefully and say goodbye to cavities. 进行削弱的吧
请大家指教,是我把reason找错了吗?
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-12-9 13:26:00 | 只看该作者

恩,自己顶下~·

板凳
发表于 2008-12-9 13:55:00 | 只看该作者
这个题目不是要你去weaken,问的是flaw in the reasoning,即推理的错误在哪里。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-12-11 13:03:00 | 只看该作者
哦谢谢,明白了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-21 07:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部