ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1153|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

不懂,请求帮助

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-7-30 22:50:00 | 只看该作者

不懂,请求帮助

In the years following an eight-cent increase in the federal tax on a pack of cigarettes, sales of cigarettes fell ten percent. In contrast, in the year prior to the tax increase, sales had fallen one percent. The volume of cigarette sales is therefore strongly related to the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes.

The argument above requires which of the following assumptions?

  1. During the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes did not increase by as much as it had during the year prior to the tax increase.

  2. The one percent fall in cigarette sales in the year prior to tax increases was due to a smaller tax increase.

  3. The pretax price of a pack of cigarettes gradually decreased throughout the year before and the year after the tax increase.

  4. For the year following the tax increase, the pretax price of a pack of cigarettes was not eight or more cents lower than it had been the previous year.

  5. As the after-tax price of a pack of cigarettes rises, the pretax price also rises.

 做了好多次,可是又做错了,看来是根本上没理解.请NN指点

 做了好多次,可是又做错了,看来是根本上没理解.请NN指点


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-30 23:01:06编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-7-31 23:43:00 | 只看该作者

主要是搞清楚裸价/税/售价的关系

pretax/tax/aftertax

pretax 裸价+tax 税=after tax 售价

文章说sale和售价的关系密切,售价涨8分,sale跌10%

但是前提是pretax这个裸价在涨税那些年,不会跌,如果跌的幅度大于tax的幅度,那么就会使得售价会出现不变甚至小于原来的售价,这样的话,结论就不成立。D is correct

板凳
发表于 2007-8-1 00:07:00 | 只看该作者
还是不懂!有事么技巧吗?
地板
发表于 2007-8-1 00:08:00 | 只看该作者

我发现了 

一定先把文章关系离出来

5#
发表于 2007-8-1 00:22:00 | 只看该作者
请问这是哪里的题?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-30 01:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部