ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1551|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全9- Question 2, 9---Help!!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-7-19 23:46:00 | 只看该作者

大全9- Question 2, 9---Help!!!

Passage 9 (9/63)

Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal that does not accord with the requirements of the free market. A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter (for that matter: so far as that is concerned), established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers seems pernicious. Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to think of price-fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both “normal” and having a valuable economic function. In fact, price-fixing is normal in all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixing that it requires. Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence, a comparatively small number of large firms will be competing for the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for more than its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-market economic theories. But each large firm will also act with full consideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. Each large firm will thus avoid significant price-cutting, because price-cutting would be prejudicial to the common interest in a stable demand for products. Most economists do not see price-fixing when it occurs because they expect it to be brought about by a number of explicit agreements among large firms; it is not.

Moreover, those economists who argue that allowing the free market to operate without interference is the most efficient method of establishing prices have not considered the economies of non-socialist countries other than the United states. These economies employ intentional price-fixing, usually in an overt fashion. Formal price-fixing by cartel and informal price-fixing by agreements covering the members of an industry are commonplace. Were there something peculiarly efficient about the free market and inefficient about price-fixing, the countries that have avoided the first and used the second would have suffered drastically in their economic development. There is no indication that they have.

Socialist industry also works within a framework of controlled prices. In the early 1970’s, the Soviet Union began to give firms and industries some of the flexibility in adjusting prices that a more informal evolution has accorded the capitalist system. Economists in the United States have hailed the change as a return to the free market. But Soviet firms are no more subject to prices established by a free market over which they exercise little influence than are capitalist firms; rather, Soviet firms have been given the power to fix prices.

2.     The passage provides information that would answer which of the following questions about price-fixing?

I.      What are some of the ways in which prices can be fixed?

II.     For what products is price-fixing likely to be more profitable that the operation of the free market?

III.   Is price-fixing more common in socialist industrialized societies or in non-socialist industrialized societies?

(A) I only

(B) III only

(C) I and II only

(D) II and III onlyA

(E) I, II, and III

The Question is A, but i don't get it, anyone can helps me?

9.     In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with

(A) predicting the consequences of a practice

(B) criticizing a point of view

(C) calling attention to recent discoveries

(D) proposing a topic for researchB

(E) summarizing conflicting opinions

The answer is B, but i don't know how can you figure out from the passage? Can anyone tells me where in the passage signals the author is criticizing a point of view?

Thanks all

I.      What are some of the ways in which prices can be fixed?

II.     For what products is price-fixing likely to be more profitable that the operation of the free market?

III.   Is price-fixing more common in socialist industrialized societies or in non-socialist industrialized societies?

(A) I only

(B) III only

(C) I and II only

(D) II and III onlyA

(E) I, II, and III

The Question is A, but i don't get it, anyone can helps me?

9.     In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with

(A) predicting the consequences of a practice

(B) criticizing a point of view

(C) calling attention to recent discoveries

(D) proposing a topic for researchB

(E) summarizing conflicting opinions

The answer is B, but i don't know how can you figure out from the passage? Can anyone tells me where in the passage signals the author is criticizing a point of view?

Thanks all

沙发
发表于 2007-7-20 08:12:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Yangsuolibyu在2007-7-19 23:46:00的发言:

Passage 9 (9/63)

Most economists in the United States seem captivated by the spell of the free market. Consequently, nothing seems good or normal that does not accord with the requirements of the free market.
    A price that is determined by the seller or, for that matter (for that matter: so far as that is concerned), established by anyone other than the aggregate of consumers
seems pernicious. Accordingly, it requires a major act of will to think of price-fixing (the determination of prices by the seller) as both “normal” and having a valuable economic function.
    In fact, price-fixing is normal in all industrialized societies because the industrial system itself provides, as an effortless consequence of its own development, the price-fixing that it requires. Modern industrial planning requires and rewards great size. Hence, a comparatively small number of large firms will be competing for the same group of consumers. That each large firm will act with consideration of its own needs and thus avoid selling its products for more than its competitors charge is commonly recognized by advocates of free-market economic theories. But each large firm will also act with full consideration of the needs that it has in common with the other large firms competing for the same customers. Each large firm will thus avoid significant price-cutting, because price-cutting would be prejudicial to the common interest in a stable demand for products. Most economists do not see price-fixing when it occurs because they expect it to be brought about by a number of explicit agreements among large firms; it is not.

Moreover, those economists who argue that allowing the free market to operate without interference is the most efficient method of establishing prices have not considered the economies of non-socialist countries other than the United states.
    These economies employ intentional price-fixing, usually in an overt fashion. Formal price-fixing by cartel and informal price-fixing by agreements covering the members of an industry are commonplace.
    Were there something peculiarly efficient about the free market and inefficient about price-fixing, the countries that have avoided the first and used the second would have suffered drastically in their economic development. There is no indication that they have.

Socialist industry also works within a framework of controlled prices. In the early 1970’s, the Soviet Union began to give firms and industries some of the flexibility in adjusting prices that a more informal evolution has accorded the capitalist system. Economists in the United States have hailed the change as a return to the free market. But Soviet firms are no more subject to prices established by a free market over which they exercise little influence than are capitalist firms; rather, Soviet firms have been given the power to fix prices.

I.      What are some of the ways in which prices can be fixed? by seller , consumer or government(power)

II.     For what products is price-fixing likely to be more profitable that the operation of the free market? no profit is discussed

III.   Is price-fixing more common in socialist industrialized societies or in non-socialist industrialized societies? no comparation in the passage

(A) I only

(B) III only

(C) I and II only

(D) II and III onlyA

(E) I, II, and III

The Question is A, but i don't get it, anyone can helps me?

9.     In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with

(A) predicting the consequences of a practice

(B) criticizing a point of view  多数经济学家认为价格不遵循自由市场自由浮动就不好,作者以工业系统,国际合作方式和苏维埃的做法举例说明价格固定的存在和好处

(C) calling attention to recent discoveries

(D) proposing a topic for researchB

(E) summarizing conflicting opinions

我自己的看法。

黄色部分是most economists的观点。

粉色部分是作者的观点。蓝色部分是作者为了反驳大部分经济学家的观点,给出的事实根据。


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-20 8:21:01编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-7-24 00:11:00 | 只看该作者
Thanks for your explanation, it made a lot of sense
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-10 01:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部