ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2467|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

蓝书上329页 76题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-11-6 12:59:23 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
76. Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tigers' habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting. Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured. The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
正确答案(E)takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers' survival as a guarantee of their survival
我的选项(A)assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced
E选项的意思是否是说“除人为猎杀外,还有其他事物对老虎的生存构成威胁”?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-11-6 20:31:47 | 只看该作者
In the statement "Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild", since it uses the word "unless", "banning tiger hunting" is only a necessary condition for tigers' survival, not a sufficient condition or guaranteed condition!

The phrases (then, only, only if, only when, must, required, unless, except, without, until) introduce a necessary condition.

The phrases (if, when, whenever, every, all, any, people who, in order to) introduce a sufficient condition.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-11-7 11:38:56 | 只看该作者
原来是必要不充分和充分不必要的问题啊,谢谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 09:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部