ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2710|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

美国大学生也做错的逻辑题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-24 21:25:00 | 只看该作者

美国大学生也做错的逻辑题

As an experienced labor organizer and the former head of one of the nation’s most powerful labor unions, Grayson is an excellent choice to chair the new council on business-labor relations.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the conclusion above?

(A) The new council must have the support of the nation’s labor leaders if it is to succeed.

(B) During his years as a labor leader, Grayson established a record of good relations with business leaders.

(C) The chair of the new council must be a person who can communicate directly with the leaders of the nation’s largest labor unions.

(D) Most of the other members of the new council will be representatives of business management interests.

(E) An understanding of the needs and problems of labor is the only qualification necessary for the job of chairing the new council.

我给我一个美国朋友做, 他一口咬定答案是B,和我选的一样。

实际答案是E,感觉E 说得太绝对,用ONLY 这个词。


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-4-24 21:27:10编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-4-25 00:47:00 | 只看该作者

奇怪的题。

感觉B的话,说的是过去。过去和商业界头头关系好并不代表现在怎么样吧。?。。。

感觉D的确是有点绝对。但是想想,问题问的是,如果下面那个条件是对的,所以,下面给的每个选项都是一个假设条件,既然是假设条件,用only就只是表示:对于chairman,这个职位只是(only)需要理解劳动人民的需要和问题所在。这么一来,如果这个假设是正确的,Gra...应该是能够当选为chairman的,因为它有丰富的经验......

排砖吧。。。

板凳
发表于 2007-4-25 13:49:00 | 只看该作者

我也觉得是B.

Anybody has found the explanation of the correct answer?

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2007-4-27 21:18:00 | 只看该作者
各位大虾帮个忙啊!
5#
发表于 2007-4-27 22:10:00 | 只看该作者

hard to tell:

B will be the answer if we havn't E for our choice.

E wants to say that understanding of the needs and problems of labor is a required condition to become a chair the new council on business-labor relations.  So his experience will give him a hand to compete such position.

B: G has a good record of relations with business leaders. It will be ok, but when comared with E which is much more clear stated, choice B still has its disadvantage.

Has a good record of good relations is not enough since record doesn't reflect the truth sometimes. If B says G has good relations with business leaders will be much more powerful to strangthen the conclusion.

Anyway, it is an answer which needs us to get via throughly comparsion.

B will stand if E doesn't exist.


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-4-27 22:11:42编辑过]
6#
发表于 2007-4-28 09:34:00 | 只看该作者
结论是最重要的,支持要从结论的角度。 本文结论是Grayson is an excellent choice to chair the new council on business-labor relations.支持答案要从为何G是合适人选去支持,落脚点在于职位的性质。原文结论只提到是关于business-labor relations,并没提到别的要求和特点。因为我们不知道good relations with business leaders是否是chair the new council on business-labor relations这个职位所需要的。所以B才无关,也即对结论不起作用,除非从原文知道chair the new council on business-labor relations需要good relations with business leaders
7#
发表于 2007-4-28 10:22:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用lawyer_1在2007-4-28 9:34:00的发言:
结论是最重要的,支持要从结论的角度。 本文结论是Grayson is an excellent choice to chair the new council on business-labor relations.支持答案要从为何G是合适人选去С郑?浣诺阍谟谥拔坏男灾省T?慕崧壑惶岬绞枪赜赽usiness-labor relations,并没提到别的要求和特点。因为我们不知道good relations with business leaders是否是chair the new council on business-labor relations这个职位所需要的。所以B才无关,也即对结论不起作用,除非从原文知道chair the new council on business-labor relations需要good relations with business leaders

It is a better explaination.

however, I thought if we haven't  E, I'll pick B it seems the next to the best choice. E much more frankly stated the requirements needed to meet.


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-4-28 10:23:07编辑过]
8#
发表于 2007-4-28 20:52:00 | 只看该作者

正因为绝对才选E, support Wamdola

坚决排除其他所有因素,才确定这个人选一定没错

9#
发表于 2007-5-23 11:38:00 | 只看该作者

非常同意楼上的观点,only的存在恰恰排除了考虑business因素的必要性,但是如果E的后面部分改成for the job of labor organization(比如说),那就得选B了。

不过说实话,题目中business这个词的存在很容易让人误入歧途,尤其在时间紧迫的情况下。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-14 00:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部