ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1564|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教啊xdf-25-7

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-5-30 15:25:00 | 只看该作者

请教啊xdf-25-7

In 1977 the prestigious Ewha Women’s University in

Seoul, Korea, announced the opening of the first

women’s studies program in Asia. Few academic

programs have ever received such public attention. In

(5) broadcast debates, critics dismissed the program as a

betrayal of national identity, an imitation of Western

ideas, and a distraction from the real task of national

unification and economic development. Even supporters

underestimated the program ; they thought it would be

(10) merely another of the many Western ideas that had

already proved useful in Asian culture, akin to airlines,

electricity, and the assembly line. The founders of the

program, however, realized that neither view was

correct. They had some reservations about the appli-

(15) cability of Western feminist theories to the role of

women in Asia and felt that such theories should be

closely examined. Their approach has thus far yielded

important critiques of Western theory, informed by the

special experience of Asian women.

(20) For instance, like the Western feminist critique of the

Freudian model of the human psyche, the Korean critique finds Freudian theory culture-bound, but in

ways different from those cited by Western theorists.

The Korean theorists claim that Freudian theory

(25) assumes the universality of the Western nuclear, male-

headed family and focuses on the personality formation

of the individual, independent of society, An analysis

based on such assumptions could be valid for a highly

competitive, individualistic society. In the Freudian

(30)
            
family drama, family members are assumed to be

engaged in a Darwinian struggle against each other

father against son and sibling against sibling. Such a

concept of projects the competitive model of Western

society onto human personalities. But in the Asian

(35) concept of personality there is no ideal attached to indi

vidualism or to the independent self. The Western model

of personality development does not explain major char-

acteristics of the Korean personality, which is social and

group-centered. The “self” is a social being defined by

(40) and acting in a group, and the well-being of both men

and women is determined by the equilibrium of the

group, not by individual self-assertion. The ideal is one

of interdependency.

In such a context, what is recognized as “depen-

(45) dency” in Western psychiatric terms is not, in Korean

terms, an admission of weakness or failure. All this bears

directly on the Asian perception of men’s and women’s

psychology because men are also “ dependent”, In

Korean culture, men cry and otherwise easily show their

(50) emotions, something that might be considered a betrayal

of masculinity in Western culture. In the kinship-based

society of Korea, four generations may live in the same

house, which means that people can be sons and daugh-

ters all their lives, whereas in Western culture, the roles

of husband and son, wife and daughter, are often incom-

patible.

 

7,Which of the following statements about the Western feminist critique of Freudian theory can be supported by information contained in the passage?

A. It recognizes the influence of Western culture on Feudian theory.

B. It was writen after 1977.

C. It acknowledges the universility of the nulear, male-headed family.

D.It challenges Freud's analysis of the role of daughters in  Western society.

E. It fails to address the issue of competitiveness in Western society.

不知道从那能看出来the influence of western culture on F theoty?

根据应该在这吧,?可是分析不出来

For instance, like the Western feminist critique of the

Freudian model of the human psyche, the Korean critique finds Freudian theory culture-bound, but in

ways different from those cited by Western theorists.

The Korean theorists claim that Freudian theory

(25) assumes the universality of the Western nuclear, male-

headed family and focuses on the personality formation

of the individual, independent of society, An analysis

based on such assumptions could be valid for a highly

competitive, individualistic society.

我选的C

沙发
发表于 2015-5-21 14:41:48 | 只看该作者
The Korean theorists claim that Freudian theory assumes the universality of the Western nuclear, male-headed family and focuses on the personality formation of the individual, independent of society.

因为这句话知道了C是不正确的,因为C是Freudian theory本身assume的内容。

For instance, like the Western feminist critique of the Freudian model of the human psyche, the Korean critique finds Freudian theory culture-bound, but in ways different from those cited by Western theorists.
这里说明了西方和韩方女权主义者都认为Freudian theory是受文化制约的,加上之前那句的 Western nuclear, male-headed family and focuses on the personality formation of the individual, independent of society,说明他们是认为是受西方文化影响的。只是韩方则认为和韩国本身文化不太一样。
板凳
发表于 2022-6-7 12:30:51 | 只看该作者
原文:For instance, like the Western feminist critique of the Freudian model of the human psyche, the Korean critique finds Freudian theory culture-bound

解释:the Korean (like the Western) 认为 Freudian theory culture-bound→ Western 认为Freudian theory 受文化制约→ Western认为/承认 Freudian theory 受文化制约/影响

It recognizes the influence of Western culture on Feudian theory.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-17 05:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部