ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 912|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

0g-12 74

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-9-16 00:05:00 | 只看该作者

0g-12 74

74. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.

(A) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump

(B) reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping

(C) reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump

(D) reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump

(E) reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

答案是D,可是我就是觉得是A。既然是reduce,肯定是reduce之前的量,而reduce本身已经使用了过去时,而be allowed是在reduced之前发生的,那么为什么要选择D呢??A选项又表达了时间又表示了内容!

thx

Verb form; Idiom

An agreement that occurred in 1972 is correctly described with the past tense verb reduced. Since the dumping continued after the date of the agreement, the past perfect verb had been allowed should instead be the present are allowed (if the agreement remained in effect when the sentence was written) or the past were allowed (if the agreement was no longer in effect when the sentence was written). Since were allowed does not appear in any of the options, we can assume that the correct verb tense is are allowed. The phrase amount of phosphates is clear and idiomatically correct, whereas phosphate amount is not idiomatic.

A Had been allowed should be are allowed.

B Th e phosphate amount should be the amount of phosphates; the omission of some form of allow is incorrect since the agreement
                    
changed not the amount dumped, but the
                    
amount permitted to be dumped.

C Present tense reduces should be the past tense reduced; the phosphate amount should be the
                
amount of phosphates; have been allowed should be are allowed.

D Correct. Th e past tense reduced is correctly used in this sentence to describe a past action, and the present tense are allowed is used to describe the present situation.

E Present tense reduces should be the past tense reduced; allowed for dumping is an incorrect idiom; allowed for dumping by municipalities

is awkward.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-8 20:39
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部