ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Guidebook writer: I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward. Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer's argument?

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2169|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

一道逻辑题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-21 03:35:00 | 只看该作者

一道逻辑题

Guidebook writer:  I have visited hotels throughout the country and have noticed that in those built before 1930 the quality of the original carpentry work is generally superior to that in hotels built afterward.  Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently.

 

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the guidebook writer’s argument?

 

 

  1. The quality of original carpentry in hotels is generally far superior to the quality of original carpentry in other structures, such as houses and stores.

  2. Hotels built since 1930 can generally accommodate more guests than those built before 1930.

  3. The materials available to carpenters working before 1930 were not significantly different in quality from the materials available to carpenters working after 1930.

  4. The better the quality of original carpentry in a building, the less likely that building is to fall into disuse and be demolished.

  5. The average length of apprenticeship for carpenters has declined significantly since 1930.
                    

为什么是D?不明白。谁明白的给解释解释

沙发
发表于 2007-4-21 04:00:00 | 只看该作者
Many building with low quality of work have been demolished, so the left are the best. So to say the works before 1930 is better than current works is not fair.
板凳
发表于 2007-4-22 14:58:00 | 只看该作者

我认为,题中强调Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently,要削弱原因,就用他因削弱。D The better quality of original carpentry.即说明不是carpenters的技术造成。B说能住更多人,无关。

请指正

地板
发表于 2007-4-22 17:07:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用TeresaCarey在2007-4-22 14:58:00的发言:

我认为,题中强调Clearly carpenters working on hotels before 1930 typically worked with more skill, care, and effort than carpenters who have worked on hotels built subsequently,要削弱原因,就用他因削弱。D The better quality of original carpentry.即说明不是carpenters的技术造成。B说能住更多人,无关。

请指正

No, I'm sorry but I think you've missed the point of this question.

In this argument which says the carpenters before 1930 are better than those who in nowdays based on the performance of the architecture based on the comparison between the old hotel's delicate carpentry and the carpentry in nowdays bulding.

D says this comparison is not fair one since the author attempts to compare the best remainings with the buildings in nowdays.  It is not a peer to peer comparison.

So D almost questioned the validation of the logical thread rather than to find out an other reason to weaken it.

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-4-24 00:51:00 | 只看该作者

GREAT!!

Thank you guys!! It does make sense!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 11:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部