ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 7314|回复: 16
打印 上一主题 下一主题

欢迎大家找我问逻辑问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-18 12:16:00 | 只看该作者

欢迎大家找我问逻辑问题

我现在已经拿到offer了,Wharton保险学PHD,近期事情不多~~

我GMAT是很早就考了770+5.5,最满意逻辑,复习后期基本不错,

以前作研究比较忙,现在终于能闲一会了,愿意为大家解惑~~

我的解释不一定最好,尤其对比那些GMAT牛人来说,呵呵

沙发
发表于 2007-4-18 19:04:00 | 只看该作者
LZ很热心啊,赞!
板凳
发表于 2007-4-18 19:48:00 | 只看该作者

流口水啊~~~

LZ对刚开始学逻辑的新手有什么建议吗?感觉现在很迷惑,根本入不了门啊,谢谢!

地板
发表于 2007-4-18 20:08:00 | 只看该作者

LZ,我想问问,只要一遇到boldface的题,我就会错.什么技巧么?

多谢指教~~~

5#
发表于 2007-4-18 20:09:00 | 只看该作者

LZ,我想问问,只要一遇到boldface的题,我就会错.有什么技巧么?

多谢指教~~~

6#
发表于 2007-4-18 20:15:00 | 只看该作者

lz麻烦你看看这道题吧

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government ‘s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

 

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

 

  1. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing plants and plastics

  2. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants

  3. More people in kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them

  4. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices

  5. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in kernland off their land and into the cities

7#
发表于 2007-4-18 20:51:00 | 只看该作者

Congs + Thanks

8#
发表于 2007-4-18 23:41:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用浅白色在2007-4-18 20:15:00的发言:

lz麻烦你看看这道题吧

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government ‘s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

  1. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing plants and plastics

  2. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants

  3. More people in kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them

  4. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices

  5. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in kernland off their land and into the cities

E?

9#
发表于 2007-4-18 23:42:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用oyoungpku在2007-4-18 12:16:00的发言:

我现在已经拿到offer了,Wharton保险学PHD,近期事情不多~~

我GMAT是很早就考了770+5.5,最满意逻辑,复习后期基本不错,

以前作研究比较忙,现在终于能闲一会了,愿意为大家解惑~~

我的解释不一定最好,尤其对比那些GMAT牛人来说,呵呵

恭喜,upenn是个好学校,enjoy yourself in Philly

10#
发表于 2007-4-20 02:50:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-10-Q29

Smithtown
                    University
’s fund-raisers succeeded in getting donations from 80 percent of the potential donors they contacted.  This success rate, exceptionally high for university fund-raisers, does not indicate that they were doing a good job.  On the contrary, since the people most likely to donate are those who have donated in the past, good fund-raisers constantly try less-likely prospects in an effort to expand the donor base.  The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.

 

Which of the following, if true, provides more support for the argument?

 

  1. Smithtown
                            University
    ’s fund-raisers were successful in their contacts with potential donors who had never given before about as frequently as were fund-raisers for other universities in their contacts with such people.

  2. This year the average size of the donations to Smithtown
                            University
    from new donors when the university’s fund-raisers had contacted was larger than the average size of donations from donors who had given to the university before.

  3. This year most of the donations that came to Smithtown
                            University
    from people who had previously donated to it were made without the university’s fund-raisers having made any contact with the donors.

  4. The majority of the donations that fund-raisers succeeded in getting for Smithtown
                            University
    this year were from donors who had never given to the university before.

  5. More than half of the money raised by Smithtown
                            University
    ’s fund-raisers came from donors who had never previously donated to the university.

I donot understand why the key is A?  My initial answer was C, but now I understand why C is not correct. How do you reason to sort A out?

Thanks.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-17 15:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部