请教下狒狒逻辑的73题

AE73. There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings, namely, the replication of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientists, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.

Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the argument?

(A) Scientific experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.

(B) Most scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review before publication.

(C) Most scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of replication.

(D) In scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud. （A）

(E) Most scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.

请问题目的推理过程是什么啊？大概什么意思，谢谢

1、先给出观点：科学家 的著作在出版之前，没有必要被officially confirmed     为什么会这样说呢？ 

2、给出解释：因为现在已经有一个system 来confirm or disconfirm    什么system呢？

3、又给出说明：the replication of results by other scientists  可以理解是别的科学家引用著作里的results,

结论：当在引用时，别的科学家根据自己的实验结果可以做出判断confirm or disconfirm    ,   因此差的著作harmless

A: results 在被引用之前unchallenged for many years.    所以这个system 失效了   。        

 下面是我上次上传的费费解释的链接，借花献佛！也谢谢nn们的辛勤劳动！

谢谢！懂了