ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1088|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

200112,section 1, 第五题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-2-12 11:44:00 | 只看该作者

200112,section 1, 第五题

company policy: an employee of our company must be impartial, particularly when dealing with family members. this obligation extends to all aspects of the job, including hiring and firing practices and the quality of service the employee provides customers.

which one of the following employee behaviors most clearly violates the company policy cited above?

(a) refusing to hire any of one's five siblings, even though they are each more qualified than any othe applicant

(d) repeatedly refusing to advance an employee, claiming that he has sometimes skipped work and that his work has been sloppy, even though no such instances have occurred for over two years.

A是答案。KAPLAN对D的解释是:one might protest that two years of good work ought to wipe out an employee's bad work history, but that'd be a value judgement independent of the principle.

想请教,可是那A里的they are each more qualified难道不也是a value judgement吗?

谢谢谢谢


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-2-12 15:47:30编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-2-12 13:31:00 | 只看该作者

what is the question?????

板凳
发表于 2007-2-13 07:40:00 | 只看该作者

company policy(information only, no argument):  an employee of our company must be impartial, particularly when dealing with family members. this obligation extends to all aspects of the job, including hiring and firing practices and the quality of service the employee provides customers.

which one of the following employee behaviors most clearly violates the company policy cited above?

The question type is generalization:

(a) refusing to hire any of one's five siblings, even though they are each more qualified than any other applicant

This is against the company policy because the five siblings are qualify for the job.

(d) repeatedly refusing to advance an employee, claiming that he has sometimes skipped work and that his work has been sloppy, even though no such instances have occurred for over two years.

have not occurred for over two year is not a good indicator, an employee can violate company policy many times before take a 2 yrs absent.

地板
发表于 2007-2-13 07:52:00 | 只看该作者

company policy(information only, no argument):  an employee of our company must be impartial, particularly when dealing with family members. this obligation extends to all aspects of the job, including hiring and firing practices and the quality of service the employee provides customers.

which one of the following employee behaviors most clearly violates the company policy cited above?

The question type is generalization:

(a) refusing to hire any of one's five siblings, even though they are each more qualified than any other applicant

This is against the company policy because the five siblings are qualify for the job.

(d) repeatedly refusing to advance an employee, claiming that he has sometimes skipped work and that his work has been sloppy, even though no such instances have occurred for over two years.

have not occurred for over two year is not a good indicator, an employee can violate company policy many times before take a 2 yrs absent.

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-2-13 23:21:00 | 只看该作者
还是不理解...
6#
发表于 2007-3-22 02:45:00 | 只看该作者

this is applying principle question. (A) is clearly violating the policy mentioned. (D) might also violate company policy but not the policy mentioned in the question stem. This answer choice has nothing to do family members at all. 是无关选项。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 13:10
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部