ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3926|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-I-18

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-9 00:26:00 | 只看该作者

大全-I-18


18.   Critics of sales seminars run by outside consultants point out that since 1987, revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees attended consultant-led seminars were lower than revenues of vacuum cleaner companies whose employees did not attend such seminars. The critics charge that for vacuum cleaner companies, the sales seminars are ill conceived and a waste of money.


Which of the following, if true, is the most effective challenge to the critics of sales seminars?


(A) Those vacuum cleaner companies whose sales were highest prior to 1987 are the only companies that did not send employees to the seminars.


(B) Vacuum cleaner companies that have sent employees to sales seminars since 1987 experienced a greater drop in sales than they had prior to 1987.


(C) The cost of vacuum cleaner sales seminars run by outside consultants has risen dramatically since 1987.


(D) The poor design of vacuum cleaner sales seminars is not the only reason for their ineffectiveness.(A)


(E) Since 1987, sales of vacuum cleaners have risen twenty percent.


please  help me ? why is A?

沙发
发表于 2004-12-10 16:00:00 | 只看该作者

A的意思是说没有参加的公司只是1987年之前营收就是最高的。所以原文1987年之后参加的营收低不能说明销售研讨会是浪费钱。也就是这个营收比较(批评者的前提)对结论是没有意义的。

答案比较绕。可以用排除法,B,C,D,E很容易排除。

板凳
发表于 2006-8-5 07:05:00 | 只看该作者

c选项为什么不对啊?

是不是因为revenue是没有除去cost的。

地板
发表于 2006-8-5 11:06:00 | 只看该作者

C) The cost of vacuum cleaner sales seminars run by outside consultants has risen dramatically since 1987.

The focus of the argument is whether the seminars can bring good results, but C is talking about how expensive the seminars are. Hence C is not related.

5#
发表于 2006-9-29 08:28:00 | 只看该作者
这到题可用他因法排除,原文说1987年后造成一些企业收入低是因为参加了sales seminars,其论据是因为1987年后参加的人比不参加的人获利低。答案A举出反例说在87年以前获利高的是那些87后没有参加sales seminars。就是说,那些高收入的企业就算参不参加都比其它企业高,而那些87年以后获利低的人并不是因为他们参加这个组织造成的。就算他们不参加这个组织也是一样的获利比那些没有参加的企业高。所以反驳论据。
6#
发表于 2007-3-13 19:17:00 | 只看该作者

我一看到prior to1987就把A排除了,因为时间段和题干说得不一致啊。这样的思维方式有什么不对吗?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-25 10:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部