ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3390|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

各位帮忙看几道逻辑题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-8-11 22:48:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.
Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.
(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.
(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.
(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.
(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.

这题怎么都没想通为啥是A??

The upcoming presidential election in the West African republic of Ganelon is of grave concern to the U.S. State Department. Ganelon presently has strong political and military ties to the United States. However, the Socialist party is widely expected to win the election, leading to fears that Ganelon will soon break away from the pro-American bloc and adopt a nonaligned or openly anti-American stance.
Which of the following is an assumption made in the passage above?
(A) A Socialist party government in Ganelon is more likely to oppose the United States than is a non-Socialist party government.
(B) The people of the United States recognize their nation’s interest in the political stability of West Africa.
(C) A weakening of U.S. political ties with Ganelon could have serious consequences for U.S. relations with other African nations.
(D) The Socialist party leaders in Ganelon believe that their nation’s interests would best be served by an alliance with anti-American forces.
(E) The Socialist party will win the upcoming election in Ganelon.
这道的AD很迷惑。。。
求大N
谢啦
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-8-11 22:56:11 | 只看该作者
同问。。求大N 解答。
板凳
发表于 2010-8-11 23:11:01 | 只看该作者
第一题如果选择A的话确实很奇怪哎。。。第二题应该是选A还是D哇?我觉得是选的D吧。。。A是属于无关联的比较吧,文中根本没有提及non-socialist啊......求大N快显身~~~~
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-14 11:06:18 | 只看该作者
难道我是毒药???
OMG!!求大N
5#
发表于 2010-8-14 12:12:10 | 只看该作者
In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.
倫敦對local工業限制空氣汙染=>鳥種類變多了 , 同樣方法也應該用在別的城市
Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:
(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.
(雖說空氣汙染主要由此工業造成 但仍無法推論必會有空氣汙染嚴重的問題或鳥種類少的問題 推行此法也沒用 )
(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.
(此法對他城有重要影響, 也就是其他城也有空氣汙染問題, good)
(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.
(跟倫敦問題一樣, good)
(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.
(鳥變多是好的 , 也就是說推行此法造成的鳥多,不會給他城帶來負面影響 good)
(E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.
(觀察到的種類變化是能真正反映的種類變化的, good)

The upcoming presidential election in the West African republic of Ganelon is of grave concern to the U.S. State Department. Ganelon presently has strong political and military ties to the United States. However, the Socialist party is widely expected to win the election, leading to fears that Ganelon will soon break away from the pro-American bloc and adopt a nonaligned or openly anti-American stance.
Which of the following is an assumption made in the passage above?
(A) A Socialist party government in Ganelon is more likely to oppose the United States than is a non-Socialist party government.
我比較同ˊ意A
如果沒此假設, 那有可能非Socialist party也是反對美國的 , 那這樣誰贏了也沒差, 都不跟美國好了...
(D) The Socialist party leaders in Ganelon believe that their nation’s interests would best be served by an alliance with anti-American forces.
把範圍限定在learders上 , e Socialist party是個團體, 團體的決定不應單只由leader的個人想法決定 , 所以我覺得這不好!
而且有"best" 更加縮小了 their nation’s interests be served的範圍
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-19 21:45:41 | 只看该作者
可我还是没有明白第一题的A,不是刚好跟题目的local industry对应吗???
7#
发表于 2010-8-21 16:26:32 | 只看该作者
可我还是没有明白第一题的A,不是刚好跟题目的local industry对应吗???
-- by 会员 Ophiliahom (2010/8/19 21:45:41)


LZ,这是我的理解:

(关键在这个almost上,取非:…air-pollution problems are not caused almost …就是说air-pollution problems不完全是local industry造成的;这句话就说明了,local industry是造成air problems一部分原因,所以没有办法削弱结论)

8#
发表于 2010-8-21 16:58:04 | 只看该作者
可我还是没有明白第一题的A,不是刚好跟题目的local industry对应吗???
-- by 会员 Ophiliahom (2010/8/19 21:45:41)



LZ,这是我的理解:

(关键在这个almost上,取非:…air-pollution problems are not caused almost …就是说air-pollution problems不完全是local industry造成的;这句话就说明了,local industry是造成air problems一部分原因,所以没有办法削弱结论)

-- by 会员 luul65 (2010/8/21 16:26:32)



这个逆向思维我是理解了。。可是正向的话 我也还是想不通
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-28 05:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部