ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1649|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教费费逻辑中的45题!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-1-29 00:18:00 | 只看该作者

请教费费逻辑中的45题!

Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner’s argument is flawed because this argument

(A) relies on information that is far from certain

(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution

(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts

(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague

(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds

 

答案是B。 B是在说把充分条件和必要条件混淆吗?可是我觉得the  plan  无论是前提还是在结论都是必要条件啊(required  solution )

 

 

沙发
发表于 2007-1-29 10:47:00 | 只看该作者

"only if" and "if" are two words have different meaning in english.

in the last sentence,  We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

That means "slove the problem----> we adopt this plan" but what we want to express the meaning is " if we adopt this plan---> slove the problem"

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-2-9 01:38:00 | 只看该作者
地板
发表于 2007-2-9 21:34:00 | 只看该作者

不知道LZ是不是和我一样,还没那么高的境界去理解英文的东东.

我的理解是:原文最后一句:only if we adopt this plan

评论人绝对化的说,只有这种方法可行. 正如LS说的,如果改成if就对了

所以,评论人的错就错在太绝对了.对应一下,选项B正确

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-4 10:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部