|
[face=Verdana] 22. All intelligent people are nearsighted. I am very nearsighted. So I must be a genius.
Which one of the following exhibits both of the logical flaws exhibited in the argument above?
(A) I must be stupid because all intelligent people are nearsighted and I have perfect eyesight.
(B) All chickens have beaks. This bird has a beak. So this bird must be a chicken.
(C) All pigs have four legs, but this spider has eight legs. So this spider must be twice as big as any pig.
(D) John is extremely happy, so he must be extremely tall because all tall people are happy.
(E) All geniuses are very nearsighted. I must be very nearsighted since I am a genius.
The argument contains three parts: (1). "All intelligent people are nearsighted." (2). The affirmation of the consequence of (1). (上面的逆命题) "I am nearsighted, so I am Intelligent." (3). Pick up the extremity of the consequence of (2) "I am very nearsighed, so I am the top of the Intelligent, the genius."
Follow this pattern, you will see (D) will be the one.[/face] |