ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3302|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-30-Q35-Q37 的答案

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-8-2 13:13:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-30-Q35-Q37 的答案

请教各位这篇阅读的答案, 谢谢了

GWD-30-Q35-Q37

 (The following was excerpted frommaterial written in 1988.)

  1.  

          For over a decade the

           most common policy advice

           given to developing countries

    Line
                                        
    by international development

      (5)      institutions has been to copy

    the export-oriented path of the

    newly industrializing countries,

    the celebrated NIC’s.  These

    economies—Brazil, Hong

     (10)      Kong, Mexico, Singapore,

    South Korea, and Taiwan

    burst into the world manufac-

    turing market in the late 1960’s

    and the 1970’s; by 1978 these

     (15)      six economies, along with India,

    enjoyed unequaled growth

    rates for gross national product

    and for exports, with exports

    accounting for 70 percent of

     (20)      the developing world’s manu-

           factured exports.  It was,

           therefore, not surprising that

    dozens of other countries

    attempted to follow their model,

     (25)      yet no countries—with the pos-

    sible exceptions of Malaysia

    and Thailand—have even

    approached their success.  In

    “No More NIC’s,” Robin Broad

     (30)      and John Cavanagh search for

    the reasons behind these fail-

    ures, identifying far-reaching

           changes in the global econ-

    omy—from synthetic substitutes

     (35)
                                            for commodity exports to

    unsustainable levels of foreign

    debt—as responsible for a glut

    economy offering little room for

          new entrants.  Despite these

     (40)     changes, the authors maintain,

    the World Bank and the Inter-

    national Monetary Fund—the

    foremost international devel-

    opment institutions—have

     (45)      continued to promote the NIC

    path as the way for heavily

    indebted developing countries

    to proceed.  And yet the futility

    of this approach should,

     (50)      according to the authors, be

    all too apparent so many years

    into a period of reduced growth

    in world markets.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Q35:

    Given the information in the passage, which of the following is a true statement about the NIC’s?

                 

    1. Their economic success among developing countries has been exceeded only by the successes of Malaysia and Thailand.
    2. By 1978 they produced 70 percent of the world’s manufactured exports.
    3. In the late 1970’s, their growth rates for gross national product were among the highest in the world.
    4. In recent years their development has been heavily subsidized by major international development institutions.
    5. They received conflicting policy advice from international development institutions in the late 1960’s and the 1970’s.

    Answer:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Q36:

    The author of the passage most clearly implies that Broad and Cavanagh disagree with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund about which of the following?

                 

    1. The ways in which the global economy has changed in recent years
    2. The causes of the unsustainable levels of foreign debt that the developing countries have incurred in recent years
    3. The level of foreign debt that should be maintained by developing countries
    4. The degree to which international development institutions should monitor the growth of developing countries
    5. The degree to which heavily indebted developing countries should emphasize exports in their overall economic strategy

    Answer:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Q37:

    The author mentions Malaysia and Thailand in order to

                 

    1. acknowledge the appearance of implausibility in a broad claim
    2. concede the possible existence of counter-examples to a generalization
    3. offer additional evidence in support of a disputed conclusion
    4. illustrate the broad applicability of a hypothesis
    5. admit the limited scope of a standard analysis

    Answer:

  1.  

          For over a decade the

           most common policy advice

           given to developing countries

    Line
                        
    by international development

      (5)      institutions has been to copy

    the export-oriented path of the

    newly industrializing countries,

    the celebrated NIC’s.  These

    economies—Brazil, Hong

     (10)      Kong, Mexico, Singapore,

    South Korea, and Taiwan

    burst into the world manufac-

    turing market in the late 1960’s

    and the 1970’s; by 1978 these

     (15)      six economies, along with India,

    enjoyed unequaled growth

    rates for gross national product

    and for exports, with exports

    accounting for 70 percent of

     (20)      the developing world’s manu-

           factured exports.  It was,

           therefore, not surprising that

    dozens of other countries

    attempted to follow their model,

     (25)      yet no countries—with the pos-

    sible exceptions of Malaysia

    and Thailand—have even

    approached their success.  In

    “No More NIC’s,” Robin Broad

     (30)      and John Cavanagh search for

    the reasons behind these fail-

    ures, identifying far-reaching

           changes in the global econ-

    omy—from synthetic substitutes

     (35)
                            for commodity exports to

    unsustainable levels of foreign

    debt—as responsible for a glut

    economy offering little room for

          new entrants.  Despite these

     (40)     changes, the authors maintain,

    the World Bank and the Inter-

    national Monetary Fund—the

    foremost international devel-

    opment institutions—have

     (45)      continued to promote the NIC

    path as the way for heavily

    indebted developing countries

    to proceed.  And yet the futility

    of this approach should,

     (50)      according to the authors, be

    all too apparent so many years

    into a period of reduced growth

    in world markets.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Q35:

    Given the information in the passage, which of the following is a true statement about the NIC’s?

                 

    1. Their economic success among developing countries has been exceeded only by the successes of Malaysia and Thailand.
    2. By 1978 they produced 70 percent of the world’s manufactured exports.
    3. In the late 1970’s, their growth rates for gross national product were among the highest in the world.
    4. In recent years their development has been heavily subsidized by major international development institutions.
    5. They received conflicting policy advice from international development institutions in the late 1960’s and the 1970’s.

    Answer:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Q36:

    The author of the passage most clearly implies that Broad and Cavanagh disagree with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund about which of the following?

                 

    1. The ways in which the global economy has changed in recent years
    2. The causes of the unsustainable levels of foreign debt that the developing countries have incurred in recent years
    3. The level of foreign debt that should be maintained by developing countries
    4. The degree to which international development institutions should monitor the growth of developing countries
    5. The degree to which heavily indebted developing countries should emphasize exports in their overall economic strategy

    Answer:

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Q37:

    The author mentions Malaysia and Thailand in order to

                 

    1. acknowledge the appearance of implausibility in a broad claim
    2. concede the possible existence of counter-examples to a generalization
    3. offer additional evidence in support of a disputed conclusion
    4. illustrate the broad applicability of a hypothesis
    5. admit the limited scope of a standard analysis

    Answer:

沙发
发表于 2008-8-13 23:07:00 | 只看该作者
35 c __unequaled  36 E indebted 37 B possible exception
板凳
发表于 2009-8-3 16:24:00 | 只看该作者
DING
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 11:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部