ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1187|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

费费 89

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-3-29 18:27:00 | 只看该作者

费费 89

        Rhizobium bacteria living in the roots of bean plants or other legumes produce fixed nitrogen which is one of the essential plant nutrients and which for non-legume crops, such as wheat, normally must be supplied by applications of nitrogen-based fertilizer. So if biotechnology succeeds in producing wheat strains whose roots will play host to Rhizobium bacteria, the need for artificial fertilizers will be reduced.

 

The argument above makes which one of the following assumptions?

(A) Biotechnology should be directed toward producing plants that do not require artificial fertilizer.

(B) Fixed nitrogen is currently the only soil nutrient that must be supplied by artificial fertilizer for growing wheat crops.

(C) There are no naturally occurring strains of wheat or other grasses that have Rhizobium bacteria living in their roots.

(D) Legumes are currently the only crops that produce their own supply of fixed nitrogen.

(E) Rhizobium bacteria living in the roots of wheat would produce fixed nitrogen.

 

答案是e,c怎么不对呢?

沙发
发表于 2007-3-29 21:26:00 | 只看该作者
做asumption类的题目一般是是取非,如果削弱该argument则为其前提。
C看似正确,其实无关。因为题目已经说了“固氮是非豆科植物的基本营养物质,必须通过含氮肥料才能获得”,而没有说是否可以通过天然的寄生根瘤菌获得。题目在问:如果生物技术能够成功的使小麦根茎成为根瘤菌的寄主,则肥料的使用就可以减少了”。所以真正的前提应该是e。如果生物技术培育的根瘤菌无法产生固氮,则削弱该结论。


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-6 19:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部