ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Educational Theorist: Recent editorials have called for limits on the amount of homework assigned to children. They point out that free-time activities play an important role in childhood development and that large amounts of homework reduce children's free time, hindering their development. But the average homework time for a ten year old, for example, is little more than 30 minutes per night. Clearly, therefore, there is no need to impose the limits these editorials are calling for.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the educational theorist's argument relies?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4373|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GMAT-26-29请教求解思路

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-11 14:37:00 | 只看该作者

GMAT-26-29请教求解思路



























Educational Theorist: Recent editorials have called for limits on the amount
of homework assigned to children. They point out that free-time activities
play an important role in childhood development and that large amounts of
homework reduce children’s free time, hindering their development. But the
average homework time for a ten year old, for example, is little more than
30 minutes per night. Clearly, therefore, there is no need to impose the
limits these editorials are calling for.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the educational theorist’s
argument relies?












The free-time activities that ten year olds engage in most are all
approximately equally effective at fostering development





Regularly doing homework assignments improves children’s academic
performance.





Individual teachers are not the best judges of how much homework to
assign the children they teach





In most schools, if not all, the homework assignments given are of a
length that does not diverge widely from the average.





Free-time activities rarely teach children skills or information that they
can use in their academic work.
沙发
发表于 2005-11-11 15:33:00 | 只看该作者
A
板凳
发表于 2005-11-11 18:56:00 | 只看该作者

D


有人提出限制作业量,因为大量的作业占用了孩子的自由活动时间,不利发展。


反对说,平均只有30分钟,所以没必要限制。


D取非,即如果各个学校作业量相差很大的话,有的很少,有的很多,那么也有必要对多的进行限制。虽然平均还是30分钟。结论不成立。


欢迎讨论。

地板
发表于 2005-11-12 00:08:00 | 只看该作者
同意D.
5#
发表于 2005-11-12 00:36:00 | 只看该作者
d
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-11-12 10:39:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢3楼的解释
7#
发表于 2005-12-17 20:43:00 | 只看该作者
同意3楼的解释
8#
发表于 2005-12-18 00:50:00 | 只看该作者
支持D
9#
发表于 2006-10-1 16:08:00 | 只看该作者
A哪里错了?
10#
发表于 2006-11-12 13:42:00 | 只看该作者

犹豫了一下,我想A错在这里

原文说了:  They point out that free-time activities play an important role in childhood development。

那么我们就应该认定,The free-time activities that ten year olds engage in, 无论孩子们engage什么,都是有益的

还是D吧。

12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: GMAT考试

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-9 02:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部