一道曾经讨论过的题，觉得还是没解决

F: We ought not to test the safety of new drugs on sentient animals, such as dogs and rabbits. Our benefit means their pain, and they are equal to us in the capacity to feel pain.

G: We must carry out such tests; otherwise, we would irresponsibly sacrifice the human lives that could have been saved by the drugs.

Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from F’s point of view to counter G’s point?

(A) Even though it is not necessary for people to use cosmetics, cosmetics are also being tested on sentient animals.

(B) Medical science already has at its disposal a great number of drugs and other treatments for serious illnesses.

(C) It is not possible to obtain scientifically adequate results by testing drugs in the test tube, without making tests on living tissue.

(D) Some of the drugs to be tested would save human beings from great pain.（E）

(E) Many tests now performed on sentient animals can be performed equally well on fertilized chicken eggs that are at a very early stage of development.

这道题曾经有人讨论过，但是看了讨论后我觉得仍然没有解决我的问题．

我选了A，答案为Ｅ

G说如果不在动物身上测试的话，那么人类的性命就会被牺牲

A：化妆品虽然不是人类必须的（即不触及人类性命问题），但是它也在动物身上测试

正好驳斥了G的论点＂因为触及了人类性命，所以要在动物身上测试＂

而E中的many tests总觉得有以偏概全的嫌疑～

望ＮＮ指点迷津！！

翻译出来,楼主请你按日常生活中的场景扮演角色,现在你就是F,我是G,我要拿你养的小白兔做实验,不要看选项,你会怎么驳斥我呢

楼主: 我们不应该做动物实验测试新药,我们人类的利益建立在这些动物的痛苦之上,动物和人类是平等的

Lucy: 我们必须做这种实验,否则我们就会无谓的牺牲可以被药物治疗的人们.

LUCY MM,你的解释很形象，谢谢：）

但是A的问题出在哪里？

E:

F:sentient animals--------------feel pain

G:sentient animals must be used to aviod sacrifice of the human lives

F:you can use fertilized chicken eggs that can not feel the pain to test the safty of your drug

A:Telling us that there  is no need to put the test on human beings since" Even though it is not necessary for people to use cosmetics, cosmetics are also being tested on sentient animals"

But question is talking about the test of drugs.

Hence I think A is not the best answer

注意题目要求用made from F’s point of view 来驳斥G,  不能离开F的论点(A犯了这个错误), F的论点是"用动物不好",反对G时一定要抓住这点

E. 可以用鸡蛋做这个实验(F牢牢抓住自己'反对动物实验'的观点来反驳G

另外: F如果用A来反驳G,那他是搬石头咂自己脚, 因为他原来的论点是反对动物实验,而A变成可以接受动物实验了

我建议lz找个身边的人, 你们进行角色扮演,看是A的回答好,还是E的回答好.  逻辑题有时光靠别人讲自己是理解不了的

谢谢LUCY MM和 GONGHAO 的解答 ：）