ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1701|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

费费逻辑题求解

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-10-26 23:11:00 | 只看该作者

费费逻辑题求解

74. Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of childcare services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond.

 

Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?

 

A.        The quality of child-care will improve.

B.        The cost of providing child-care services will increase.

C.        The government will use funding to foster advances in child-care.

D.       If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond.

E.        If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing childcare will not increase.

Answer: B

为什么E就不行呢?费费解释为是否命题不能得到的结论。我怎么觉得是可以得到的呀。

85. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the method used to counter the automakers’ current position?

 

A.        The automakers’ premises are shown to lead to a contradiction.

B.        Facts are mentioned that show that the automakers are relying on false information.

C.        A flaw is pointed out in the reasoning used by the automakers to reach their conclusion.

D.       A comparison is drawn between the automakers’ current position and a position they held in the past.

E.        Evidence is provided that the new emissions legislation is both economically feasible and environmentally necessary.

Answer D

可是怎么看也看不出来有现在和以前对比立场的对比呀。

89.
                Rhizobium bacteria living in the roots of bean plants or other legumes produce fixed nitrogen, which is one of the essential plant nutrients and which for non-legume crops, such as wheat, normally must be supplied by applications of nitrogen-based fertilizer. So if biotechnology succeeds in producing wheat strains whose roots will play host to Rhizobium bacteria, the need for artificial fertilizers will be reduced.

 

The argument above makes which one of the following assumptions?

 

A.        Biotechnology should be directed toward producing plants that do not require artificial fertilize.

B.        Fixed nitrogen is currently the only soil nutrient that must be supplied by artificial fertilizer for growing wheat crops.

C.        There are no naturally occurring strains of wheat or other grasses that have Rhizobium bacteria living in their roots.

D.       Legumes are currently the only corps that produce their own supply of fixed nitrogen.

E.        Rhizobium bacteria living in the roots of wheat would produce fixed nitrogen.

Answer E

为什么C不对呢?把它取非weaken作者结论啊。

95. Scientific research that involves international collaboration has produced papers of greater influence, as measured by the number of times a paper is cited in subsequent papers, than has research without any collaboration. Papers that result from international collaboration are cited an average of seven times, whereas papers with single authors are cited only three times on average. This difference shows that research projects conducted by international research teams are of greater importance than those conducted by single researchers.

 

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

A.        Prolific writers can inflate the number of citations they receive by citing themselves in subsequent papers.

B.        It is possible to ascertain whether or not a paper is the product of international collaboration by determining the number of citations it has received.

C.        The number of citations a paper receives is a measure of the importance of the research it reports.

D.       The collaborative efforts of scientists who are citizens of the same country do not produce papers that are as important as papers that are produced by international collaboration.

E.        International research teams tend to be more generously funded than are single researchers.

Answer C.

Why not D. 把它取非weaken作者结论啊。

96. Prominent business executives often play active roles in United States presidential campaigns as fundraisers or backroom strategists, but few actually seek to become president themselves. Throughout history the great majority of those who have sought to become president have been lawyers, military leaders, or full-time politicians. This is understandable, for the personality and skills that make for success in business do not make for success in politics. Business is largely hierarchical, whereas politics is coordinative. As a result, business executives tend to be uncomfortable with compromises and power-sharing, which are inherent in politics.

 

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the proposed explanation of why business executives do not run for president?

 

A.        Many of the most active presidential fundraisers and backroom strategists are themselves politicians.

B.        Military leaders are generally no more comfortable with compromises and power-sharing than are business executives.

C.        Some of the skills needed to become a successful lawyer are different from some of those needed to become a successful military leader.

D.       Some former presidents have engaged in business ventures after leaving office.

E.        Some hierarchically structured companies have been major financial supporters of candidates for president.

answer B.

But why not A?

101:

Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence, Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.

Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist, Dr. Ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

 

 Anson bases his conclusion about Dr. Ladlow on which one of the following?

 

A.        an attack on Dr. Ladlow’s character

B.        the application of a general principle

C.        the use of an ambiguous term

D.       the discrediting of facts

E.        the rejectiion of a theoretical explanation

Answer: B

Why?

 

沙发
发表于 2006-10-27 01:29:00 | 只看该作者

74
选B应该没问题吧。
关于E,这是一个典型的否命题。否命题是不一定为真的。而你否命题才为真。这个题目里,你否命题应

该是,(不就是否命题前后顺序颠倒一下?)

If the cost of providing childcare will not increase, child-care services are not regulated.
不知道把这个写出来,你是否会觉得好理解一些。

或是再打个比方,
1、regulation造成cost increase,
2、但是不一定cost increase都是由regulation造成的
3、所以即便child-care services are not regulated
4、也不能说cost一定不up

把3 和 4 连起来,就是E了···


85
现在的观点overly expensive and unnecessary to efforts to curb air pollution.
过去的观点neither economically feasible nor environmentaly necessary···但后面有个however
接着就是enabled automakers to meet the 1970 standards efficiently。这里我觉得就是说,其发明

使automakers改变过上面说到的过去的观点。
这里怎么说呢,这个似乎只能用排除法。
A 前提矛盾
B 信息错误
C 错误理由
D 立场对比
E 否定了题目前提

这样我只能看到有一点对比的存在··· 可能你也不太满意我的解释。要不我们继续等牛牛?:)

89
evidence:
Rhizobium bacteria of bean or other legumes produce fixed nitrogen
conclusion:
wheat's need for artificial fertilizers will be reduced

assumption:
架桥咯 E 没有问题 A无关  BDweaken
C其实很迷惑,
1 和题目中的normally must be supplied by applications of nitrogen-based fertilizer.反了。否

定了前提。
2 和E对照一下,你就会发现,其实架桥是架Rhizobium bacteria 和 fixed nitrogen的桥。也就是说,

需要的是fixed nitrogen 而不是Rhizobium bacteria。光有Rhizobium bacteria和fertilizer不管

是natural的还是artificial,还是不能weaken啊··
所以如果这里说, There are no naturally occurring strains of wheat or other grasses that

have Rhizobium bacteria living in their roots that can produce fixed nitrogen. 才是weaken。

95
evidence:
that result from international collaboration are cited an average of 7 times, whereas papers

with single authors are cited only 3 times on average.
conclusion:
洋论文 is more important than 土论文

assumption:
架桥咯
C 数目决定其重要性 

A weaken
B 无关
E 无关

D limited的思想告诉我们,同国籍合作的论文,这是一个无关元素。
这里说,国际合作的论文比单个作者的论文重要
        国际合作的论文和国内合作的论文一样重要
我也看不出去no怎么weaken了·
如果这里weaken了就是说国内合作=国际合作<=单个作者,这个没法比吧 ···
所以limited一下比较好,见到莫名其妙的说法,暂时就不要看下去了···
大多是ETS在吹牛
当然24题除外···

96
太多了我简单一点可以么?

premise
Business is largely hierarchical and tend to be uncomfortable with compromises and

power-sharing, whereas politics is coordinative(and tend to be comfortable with compromises

and power-sharing)
conclusion
lawyers, military leaders, or full-time politicians变成presidents,而business executives变成

fundraisers

这里针对前提削弱,B
A 大多数fundraisers是政客 这个和作为fundraisers的商人没什么关系吧···

101
没法回答你,我上来直接选A 呵呵
看解释是说
Dr. Ladlow 不负责,RPWT
而前提是
研究不会有最终结论
因为负责的研究员承认意外的可能,使之结论错误
a 竟然说是典型错误。 难道是我RPWT?不过我承认如果当对于某人的评价作为conclusion,而不

是evidence的时候,就不是说他的论证方法是人身攻击了
b 是说其利用了前提的两个元素。但我也不明白解释中的使用“not”反证说明什么问题
c 对于结论非必要。
d 错了,不是关注事实。
e 否定结果吧,说不清···

1. After reading the question, I know that it is an INFERENCE question. I know that the

answer is a REQUIRED condition for the conclusion.
我觉得解释这句很重要,是说选项中什么是Anson所说内容的必要条件。?
期待大牛们继续详解!!!

板凳
发表于 2006-10-27 02:10:00 | 只看该作者

楼上真是一好人。我来支持一下,顺便说说101

Z说D靠谱儿,因为他提出了一个理论,给出了证据。然后说他的理论不可反驳。

A说不对。并不是有理有据,理论不可反驳。一切理论都有他被打倒的余地。靠谱儿的科学家要接受质疑。

选项A 。 因为anson的话里没有说D不靠谱儿。只是说科学家XXXXX,所以不对

B. 注意anson说的是responsible scientists,一个泛指。好像说靠谱儿的gmatter都应该上CD,这个是一个概括的说法。 所以是generalization

C.如果要选这个,A必须说 “不对,你的话不靠谱儿,因为我对predication的理解和你不一样,predication应该素介个样子D : .......”

D.的话,A应该说“不对,你骗银!!其实那哥哥根本就没有证据,他也没做实验!”

E的话,A应该说“你对这个理论的解释不对,这个理论应该是。。。” 但是Z说的是一个结论,即D得claim很靠谱儿,而不是理论。理论应该是好像:重力会导致我跳楼是往下落而不是往上飞。。。。

 

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-27 02:12:00 | 只看该作者
Thanks a lot for your answer although there is still confusion for some answer.
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-27 22:06:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢latecomer的热心答复。我还有问题。
74。inference的问题可以assumption来处理吗?如果可以,把E取非,不就是如果制定规则,费用不会上升。不是就weaken了吗?
95。通常怎样判定无关元素。看到很多解释说,要末无关,要么是无关元素,不考虑。可我经常很难判断。有时它们之间是有联系。比如这题。题目特别强调国际合作的文章就被引用的多(暗含之意就国际合作重要)。所以我想D取非就可以。因为取非后就是:同一国家的作者出的论文和国际合作的一样重要。weaken.
96。我想的是A说的是:其实那些总统竞选中积极募捐和提供策略的人,本身就是政治家。这样和作者的结论相背,weaken了作者结论。

以上是我自己的一些混乱的考虑。欢迎分析评论和指正。

另外再请教一下做逻辑的好方法。现在每次做都错很多,完全没有提高。看到好多大牛后来做到几乎不错,真是羡慕。不知道什么时候到那种境界。还听大牛说是一种感觉,有了感觉就有质的飞跃。怎样才能快点有质的飞跃。还有,有的大牛说,30秒可以做一道逻辑题,我怎么觉得难度颇高啊。大家都这样吗?还是我太笨了?


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-10-27 22:15:23编辑过]
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 23:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部