答案似有问题?

Q20:

Five years ago, as part of a plan to encourage citizens of Levaska to increase the amount of money they put into savings, Levaska’s government introduced special savings accounts in which up to $3,000 a year can be saved with no tax due on the interest unless money is withdrawn before the account holder reaches the age of sixty-five.  Millions of dollars have accumulated in the special accounts, so the government’s plan is obviously working.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A.   A substantial number of Levaskans have withdrawn at least some of the money they had invested in the special accounts.

B.    Workers in Levaska who already save money in long-term tax-free accounts that are offered through their workplace cannot take advantage of the special savings accounts introduced by the government.

C.   The rate at which interest earned on money deposited in regular savings accounts is taxed depends on the income bracket of the account holder.

D.   Many Levaskans who already had long-term savings have steadily been transferring those savings into the special accounts.

E.    Many of the economists who now claim that the government’s plan has been successful criticized it when it was introduced.

答案是D

我觉得A削弱, 说很多人撤消了部分投资在特殊帐户上钱, 不就说明这个计划没用了吗?

 D应该是加强吧,说人们把钱转到特殊帐户上

是啊  我刚刚发了帖子。。问这道题目！！

你是不是也是刚做到GWD5阿？

应该是没有问题的。A是Support，B是Support，C、E貌似无关选项。看我对二楼的帖子回复。