ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1639|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og10-80 帮忙分析一下

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-10-8 01:06:00 | 只看该作者

og10-80 帮忙分析一下

80.The program to control the entry of illegal drugs into the country was a failure in 1987. If the program had been successful, the wholesale price of most illegal drugs would not have dropped substantially in 1987.

 

The argument in the passage depends on which of the following assumptions?

(A) The supply of illegal drugs dropped substantially in 1987.

(B) The price paid for most illegal drugs by the average consumer did not drop substantially in 1987.

(C) Domestic production of illegal drugs increased at a higher rate than did the entry of such drugs into the country.

(D) The wholesale price of a few illegal drugs increased substantially in 1987. E

(E) A drop in demand
            
for most illegal drugs in 1987 was not the sole cause of the drop in their wholesale price.

 

80.

The only choice that must be true in order to conclude legitimately from the drop in the wholesale price of illegal drugs that the program was a failure is choice E, the best answer. If the drop in price was caused by a drop in demand, there is no reason to suspect that there has been any increase in supply caused by drugs entering the country.

 

The other choices can be false without affecting the argument. The supply of illegal drugs need not have dropped (choice A), and the retail price could have dropped (choice B). The entry of illegal drugs could have risen at a higher rate than domestic production (choice C), and no illegal drug need have undergone a substantial price rise (choice D).

问题是知道e是正确答案,但是为何a-d不正确呢?解释说without affecting the argument,这句话是如何理解呢?项做这种assumption题哪种方法呢?是不是像lawyer说的在作这种题的时候 有时会出现新元素,in demand是不是新元素呢?一连串的问题。谢谢!

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-8 01:13:00 | 只看该作者

80.

The only choice that must be true in order to conclude legitimately from the drop in the wholesale price of illegal drugs that the program was a failure is choice E, the best answer. If the drop in price was caused by a drop in demand, there is no reason to suspect that there has been any increase in supply caused by drugs entering the country.

 

The other choices can be false without affecting the argument. The supply of illegal drugs need not have dropped (choice A), and the retail price could have dropped (choice B). The entry of illegal drugs could have risen at a higher rate than domestic production (choice C), and no illegal drug need have undergone a substantial price rise (choice D).

没有贴上,再贴一遍。知道答案e是正确的,为何a-d是不正确的呢?without affecting the argument. 这句话如何理解呢?做这种题型用哪种方法呢?是不是像lawyer说的要出现新元素,in demand是不是 新元素呢?一连串的问题。谢谢

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-8 01:22:00 | 只看该作者
不知为何解释贴补上。只有自己重新写了。答案为e,但是为何其他的不对呢,再og得解释当中the other choice can be false without affecting the argument.这句话如何理解呢?为何是without affecting the argument呢。作这种题的方法是什莫呢?像lawyer说的会出现新的元素,in demand 是不是新元素呢?帮忙解释一下吧.thanks
地板
发表于 2006-10-8 01:32:00 | 只看该作者
这个俺知道,e是典型的排除他因,正确选项的一个长相
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-10-8 04:24:00 | 只看该作者
能不能解释一下为何是排除他因呢?好像我对这种题没有感觉
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-29 11:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部