ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1526|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

两道CR..跪求大牛解答

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-1 16:47:51 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
1.In one state, all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinances.A petition entitled “Petition for Statewide Smoking Restriction” is being circulated to voters by campaign workers who ask only, “Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction?”The petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public.


Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide?


  1. Health costs associated with smoking cause health insurance premiums to rise for everyone and so affect nonsmokers.
  2. In rural areas of the state, there are relatively few retail establishments and government offices that are open to the public.
  3. The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does.
  4. There is considerable sentiment among voters in most areas of the state for restriction of smoking.
  5. The state law would not affect existing local ordinances banning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard.


2.Editorial in Krenlandian Newspaper:


Krenland’s steelmakers are losing domestic sales because of lower-priced imports, in many cases because foreign governments subsidize their steel industries in ways that are banned by international treaties.But whatever the cause, the cost is ultimately going to be jobs in Krenland’s steel industry.Therefore, it would protect not only steel companies but also industrial employment in Krenland if our government took measures to reduce cheap steel imports.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the editorial’s argument?


  1. Because steel from Krenland is rarely competitive in international markets, only a very small portion of Krenlandian steelmakers’ revenue comes from exports.
  2. The international treaties that some governments are violating by giving subsidies to steelmakers do not specify any penalties for such violations.
  3. For many Krenlandian manufacturers who face severe international competition in both domestic and export markets, steel constitutes a significant part of their raw material costs.
  4. Because of advances in order-taking, shipping, and inventory systems, the cost of shipping steel from foreign producers to Krenland has fallen considerably in recent years.
  5. Wages paid to workers in the steel industry in Krenland differ significantly from wages paid to workers in many of the countries that export steel to Krenland.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-4 13:44:01 | 只看该作者
GWD里的题 第一题选E 第二题选C
求解释~
板凳
发表于 2010-5-4 14:27:40 | 只看该作者
第二题:
K地的钢铁制造商因为外国货物便宜而渐渐失去国内市场
因为外国政府给国外钢铁行业以国际上禁止的补助
但是不论如何
受害的都是K地钢铁行业的就业率

所以:结论是:
如果K地政府减少低价的外国钢铁的进口的话
一定会1.保护K国的钢铁行业
     2.保护K国第二产业的整体就业率

C选项:K国制造商们面临着国内外的竞争,而他们主要的原材料就是钢铁。。

。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

如果像题中说的政府限制外国低价钢铁进口的话
会影响K过国制造商的说
所以题中结论2就会被推翻了的说。。。。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-18 05:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部