ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1503|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全B-16求教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-8-30 17:39:00 | 只看该作者

大全B-16求教

16.   Some commentators complain that a “litigation explosion” in the past decade has led to unreasonably high costs for U.S. businesses by encouraging more product liability suits against manufacturers. However, these complaints are based mainly on myth. Statistics show that the number of successful product liability suits has remained almost the same, and the average sum awarded in damages has grown no faster than the inflation rate.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

(A) The number of unsuccessful suits has skyrocketed, imposing huge new legal expenses on businesses.

(B) Several of the largest awards ever made in product liability cases occurred within the last two years.

(C) The rise of the consumer movement has encouraged citizens to seek legal redress for product flaws.

(D) Lawyers often undertake product liability cases on a contingency basis, so their payment is based on the size of the damages awarded.A

(E) Juries often award damages in product liability suits out of emotional sympathy for an injured consumer.

答案选A,不太明白。不明白文中的successful指的是什么方面的?

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-8-31 00:14:00 | 只看该作者
米人回答呀,顶一下
板凳
发表于 2006-8-31 08:38:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得是指产品投诉胜诉~ 原文 中commentators说商家起诉厂家的情况增加了,COST当然也增加了。Statistics说成功的投诉数量没有增加。A是说不成功的案例增加了,使得BUSSINESS增加了诉讼费的开销,WEAKEN了Statistics的说法。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-21 12:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部