ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1559|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 26-19

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-12-13 17:13:00 | 只看该作者

GWD 26-19

Plant scientists have been able to genetically engineer vegetable seeds to produce crops that are highly resistant to insect damage. Although these seeds currently cost more than conventional seeds, their cost is likely to decline. Moreover, farmers planting them can use far less pesticide, and most consumers prefer vegetables grown with less pesticide. Therefore, for crops for which these seeds can be developed, their use is likely to become to norm.


Which of the following would be most useful to know in evaluating the argument above?


A.      Whether plant scientists have developed inset-resistant seeds for every crop that is currently grown commercially


B.      Whether farmers typically use agricultural pesticides in larger amounts than is necessary to prevent crop damage


C.      Whether plants grown form the new genetically engineered seeds can be kept completely free of insect damage


D.     Whether seeds genetically engineered to produce insect-resistant crops generate significantly lower per acre crop yields than do currently used seeds


E.      Whether most varieties of crops currently grown commercially have greater natural resistance to insect damage than did similar varieties in the past


我觉得D最重要,可答案是B

沙发
发表于 2005-12-26 14:27:00 | 只看该作者
D
板凳
发表于 2006-3-7 23:09:00 | 只看该作者
这道题以前的gwd讨论有过相对的定论,应该是D
地板
发表于 2006-3-8 19:05:00 | 只看该作者

evaluating the argument above


这类类型的CR,我们应该如何去分析呢?


谢谢先

5#
发表于 2006-8-16 10:29:00 | 只看该作者

 在D和 B中犹豫很久 B为什么不对呢 

我觉得题目得重点在于

 Moreover, farmers planting them can use far less pes-

ticide, and most consumers prefer vegetables grown with less pesticide,

如果是,那么不用新得种子就可以use far less pesticide

如果不是,那么就要用新得种子了

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 11:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部