ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1642|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一道逻辑题的结构~~LSAT的

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-3-3 17:49:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
题目如下:(摘至Powerscore)
Every year, new reports appear concerning the health risks posed by certain substances, such as coffee and sugar. One year an article claimed that coffee is dangerous to one’s health. The next year, another article argued that coffee has some benefits for one’s health. From these contradictory opinions, we see that experts are useless for guiding one’s decisions about one’s health.

这道题要求分析该Argument的premise和conclusion各是什么,Powerscore这本书分析如下:

Conclusion: From these contradictory opinions, we see that experts are useless for guiding one’s
decisions about one’s health.
Premise: Every year, new reports appear concerning the health risks posed by certain substances,
such as coffee and sugar.
Premise: One year an article claimed that coffee is dangerous to one’s health.
Premise: The next year, another article argued that coffee has some benefits for one’s health.

我想请问一下~~为什么Every year, new reports appear concerning the health risks posed by certain substances, such as coffee and sugar这句话也算是premise呢?我觉得它只是个Fact而已啊~~请高人解答··
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-3-3 18:15:36 | 只看该作者
我认为如果没有Every year, new reports appear concerning the health risks posed by certain substances, such as coffee and sugar,下面的结论就出现的太突然了,所以这三句话时密不可分的,都是该结论的前提啊,fact不可以做前提吗?前三句话都是fact啊~~只是起到了为结论提供前提的作用,不知道这么说对不
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-3-3 19:52:31 | 只看该作者
thank you~~understand~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 06:16
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部