请教XDF补充教材section 10-(19)

19. Industrialists from the country Distopia were

accused of promoting the Distopian intervention in

the Arcadian civil war merely to insure that the

industrialists' facilities in Arcadia made substantial

profits during the war. Yet this cannot be the motive

since, as the Distopians foresaw, Distopia's federal

expenses for the intervention were eight billion

dollars, whereas, during the war, profits from the

Distopian industrialists’ facilities in Arcadia totaled

only four billion dollars.

Which of the following, if true, exposes a serious

flaw in the argument made in the second sentence

above?

(A) During the Arcadian war, many Distopian

industrialists with facilities located in Arcadia

experienced a significant rise in productivity

in their facilities located in Distopia

(B) The largest proportion of Distopia's federal

expenses is borne by those who receive no

significant industrial profits.

(C) Most Distopian industrialists' facilities located

in Arcadia are expected to maintain the level

of profits they achieved during the war.

本题的题意是，D国企业家被指责在A国内战中进行干涉，以保证他们在A国的设施获得利润。但企业家们说，不对，因为干涉花了80亿，而他们的收益只有40亿。要反驳企业家的话，就是要说明干涉对企业家来说是有利可图的。从题干上可以隐约感觉到，企业家们的收益是自己的，但干涉的费用不一定全由企业家们出。

A增加了企业家在A的设施生产能力，原文没有。而且从意思上看，这只能说明增加了企业家的支出，而且不一定能保证收入，反而加强了企业家的话。错。

C是说明要将利润保持到战后，D是讲战前，这两个选项时间上和题意就不一致。E更是明显的无关选项。

而B的意思是说，D国国家的干涉费用的最主要部分产生于没有收入的“冤大头”（其实就是政府出了，中央情报局常干这事儿），而只有一部分来源于企业家。比如D国总共出了80亿的干涉费用，而绝大部分比如说70亿都是由“没有利润的”出了，企业家只出了10亿，而企业家的获利是40亿，是不是他们还是大捞一票？