ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1178|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-12-32

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-9-4 16:39:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-12-32

Q32:

Newspaper editorial:

 

In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher.  Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses.  However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released from prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

 

  1. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
  2. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
  3. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
  4. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
  5. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

答案是C,但是我觉得这个答案会削弱论断。请赐教

沙发
发表于 2006-9-4 17:12:00 | 只看该作者

这个题比较绕

绕来绕去的

C要说的是上课前的状态,即上大学的课前,选择上课的人比不选上课的人要不容易犯罪,即说并非是大学的课使得其犯罪减少,而是其本身就是这样的人。

如果X帮人本身比起其它人犯罪少的话,那么即使X选择了上课,也不能得出,是因为上课使得X犯罪减少。

C对这样的情况进行了排除。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-9-4 22:54:00 | 只看该作者

多谢

多谢啊

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-12 19:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部