ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1768|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-1-7 改一下谁是答案?

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-17 12:11:00 | 只看该作者

大全-1-7 改一下谁是答案?

大全-1-7.      Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from being pirated. With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. Such investment frequently results in an increase in a manufacturer’s productivity.

Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit financial institutions as well as manufacturers.

(B) Increased productivity in manufacturing is likely to be accompanied by the creation of more manufacturing jobs.

(C) Manufacturers will decrease investment in the development of new products and technologies unless there are stronger patent laws.

(D) The weakness of current patent laws has been a cause of economic recession.E

(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacture

如果改成PRODUCTIVITY DECREASE. 是不是正确?

这道题是不是因果型的啊,所以非a---> 非b

The city’s public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.

The statements above best support the conclusion that

(A) the private firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry

(B) political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs

(C) private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs

(D) the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firmB

(E) the municipal government would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs

这个也是因果型的吧

也是非a 非b 这么推倒的是吧?

沙发
发表于 2006-7-17 12:50:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用allen0018在2006-7-17 12:11:00的发言:

大全-1-7.      Stronger patent laws are needed to protect inventions from being pirated. With that protection, manufacturers would be encouraged to invest in the development of new products and technologies. Such investment frequently results in an increase in a manufacturer’s productivity.

Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the information above?

(A) Stronger patent laws tend to benefit financial institutions as well as manufacturers.

(B) Increased productivity in manufacturing is likely to be accompanied by the creation of more manufacturing jobs.

(C) Manufacturers will decrease investment in the development of new products and technologies unless there are stronger patent laws.

(D) The weakness of current patent laws has been a cause of economic recession.E

(E) Stronger patent laws would stimulate improvements in productivity for many manufacture

如果改成PRODUCTIVITY DECREASE. 是不是正确?

这道题是不是因果型的啊,所以非a---> 非b

The city’s public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.

The statements above best support the conclusion that

(A) the private firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry

(B) political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs

(C) private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs

(D) the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firmB

(E) the municipal government would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs

这个也是因果型的吧

也是非a 非b 这么推倒的是吧?

第一个不能。。。。知识产权保护不利,可能使生产率的增长不是那么快,但还不至于decrease。在这种情况下,如果用possibly就可以了。
你后面这一题推导的是个条件,对条件取非就可以看出问题来了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 06:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部