ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1092|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG10 63再问,选项B,对前面讨论仍不解,且无定论

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-22 18:31:00 | 只看该作者

OG10 63再问,选项B,对前面讨论仍不解,且无定论

63. Traditionally, decision-making by managers that is reasoned step-by-step has been considered preferable to intuitive decision-making. However, a recent study found that top managers used intuition significantly more than did most middle-or lower-level managers. This confirms the alternative view that intuition is actually more effective than careful, methodical reasoning.

 The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?

 The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?

 The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Methodical, step-by-step reasoning is inappropriate for making many real-life management decisions.

(B) Top managers have the ability to use either intuitive reasoning or methodical, step-by-step reasoning in making decisions.

(C) The decisions made by middle-and lower-level managers can be made as easily by using methodical reasoning as by using intuitive reasoning.

(D) Top managers use intuitive reasoning in making the majority of their decisions.
(E) Top managers are more effective at decision-making than middle-or lower-level managers

B的解释为since the argument leaves open the possibility of situations in which top manager are unable to use one of the methods ,choice B is inappropriate

OG11-R63的解释是:Managers' ability to switch modes is not the issue; the issue is the quality of the decision made.
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-22 19:45:41编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-7-22 18:33:00 | 只看该作者

1leaves open the possibility 是什么意思?

2、我的思路:如果对B取非,高级经理没有能力使用其中一种方法或另一种,是不是对fact的前提的反对呢?因为假如高级经理没有能力use strp-by-step reasoning in making the decision,那么得出另一种方法intuitive reasoning more effective 的结论就不能成立了,因为不是因为更有效,而是因为高级经理只会这一种方法,由此对B取非后削弱。

但是对B取非就否定了原推理的前提条件,而weaken是不能weaken条件的,不然后面的推理没有意义了

 不知我的思路错在哪里,出不来了。。。。

而且对B的解释还不能理解其中的玄机。。。。。

MOMOYU  GG还把这个B选项归为中立作用,跟不理解了

2>

leave open the possibility, 因为assumption需要support,

若可以中立,则不起support 的作用

63: manager can use either intuitive or step-by-step

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=137268&replyID=&skin=1


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-22 18:53:44编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-7-22 18:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用bigmouse在2005-5-26 22:12:00的发言:

当B取非以后,意思是高级经理没有能力用感觉推理或按部就班的推理。对结论并没有什么作用。换句话说高级经理有没有能力用……,对结论This confirms the alternative view that intuition is actually more effective than careful, methodical reasoning没有任何削弱作用~~

个人意见~~

以下是引用welkin在2005-6-19 14:11:00的发言:

个人觉得OG是从“假设是文中结论成立的必要条件”方面进行解释的,也就是说如果一个选项,在原文结论成立的基础上,可能不成立,这个选项就不可能是结论的前提假设。

比如答案B,OG解释说:Since the argument
                    
leaves open the possibility of situations in which top managers are unable to use one of the methods
, choice B is inappropriate ,就是在说原文的argument成立的情况下有可能top managers are unable to use one of the methods,也就是B不成立。
D也是类似的原因

这是前辈们的讨论,感觉不一致的说


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-22 18:57:19编辑过]
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2006-8-1 11:48:00 | 只看该作者
顶上来啊~~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-29 23:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部