ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1472|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全18-2

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-10 23:19:00 | 只看该作者

大全18-2

Crimes are mainly committed by the young, and for this reason merely increasing the number of police officers or expenditures on police services has little effect on reducing the crime rate. In fact, the only factor associated with a crime-rate drop is a decrease in the number of people in the community aged fourteen to thirty.

The findings above can best serve as part of an argument against

(A) the likelihood that any law enforcement program will be effective in reducing the crime rate within a short time

(B) increasing prison terms for young people found guilty of crimes

(C) introducing compulsory military conscription for people aged seventeen to nineteen

(D) raising the age at which students are permitted to leave school

(E) a community’s plan to increase the number of recreational and educational activities in which young adults can participate

the answer is A.  why?

i take E.            at first glance, A sounds irrelevant.

thanks a million for answer.

沙发
发表于 2006-7-11 02:17:00 | 只看该作者

In fact, A is the best answer. Take a look at it: (A) the likelihood that any law enforcement program will be effective in reducing the crime rate within a short time.

Since no one can change the population of certain age range in a short time, the crime rate would not drop shortly.

However, I must point out that this is a very bad question b/c it has many seemingly correct choices. Hence, I don't think it can appear in any GMAT test.

板凳
发表于 2006-7-11 10:05:00 | 只看该作者

这是一个归纳题

归纳文章的意思反对选项

文章说警察没用,无法降低年轻人的犯罪率,唯一的办法就是降低年轻人的数目

A刚好反对的就是法律强制(比如警察,法庭啊什么的)

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-26 14:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部