ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1233|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问一道LSAT题,section 1-23

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-8-13 07:13:00 | 只看该作者

问一道LSAT题,section 1-23

此题不理解为什么是D?我选的是A,觉得因为问的是NOT undermine,A基本是个无关选项,所以不会undermine,就选了。不明白D怎么就NOT undermine了?先谢谢浏览此帖,欢迎讨论。

23.   The function of government is to satisfy the genuine wants of the masses, and government cannot satisfy those wants unless it is informed about what those wants are. Freedom of speech ensures that such information will reach the ears of government officials. Therefore, freedom of speech is indispensable for a healthy state.

Which one of the following, if true, would NOT undermine the conclusion of the argument?

(A) People most often do not know what they genuinely want.

(B) Freedom of speech tends ultimately to undermine social order, and social order is a prerequisite for satisfying the wants of the masses.

(C) The proper function of government is not to satisfy wants, but to provide equality of opportunity.

(D) Freedom of speech is not sufficient for satisfying the wants of the masses: social order is necessary as well.D

(E) Rulers already know what the people want.

沙发
发表于 2009-8-13 09:16:00 | 只看该作者

    Freedom of speechàensure infoàGovernment Informedàsatisfy

    结论是freedom of speech is indispensable

A 如果人们通常不知道自己真正要什么,那么即使有freedom,也不能ensure info

B 说言论自由最终对social order不好,而social ordersatisfy的前提条件,那么就是他因否定了

C 政府的只能不是satisfy,那么即使言论自由可以satisfy,也不能导致healthy state,属于直接否性结论

D 言论自由单独不充分,还需要social order,但是没有否定言论自由是indispensable,可以两个和在一起推出结论,但是一个都不能少,还是indispensable

E 如果统治者已经知道大家要什么,那么言论自由就没有必要了,所以也是直接削弱了原因

最近也在做LSAT,刚好一个礼拜前开始做得这题,哈哈
[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/13 9:18:18编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-8-13 13:17:00 | 只看该作者
非常感谢kevin的详细解释,现在明白了,LSAT的题还是比GMAT绕一些啊!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 12:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部