ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1627|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-7-Q41???

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-10 03:01:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-7-Q41???


    

Magazine Publisher: 
Our magazine does not have a liberal bias.  It is true that when a book review we had
commissioned last year turned out to express distinctly conservative views, we
did not publish it until we had also obtained a second review that took a
strongly liberal position.  Clearly,
however, our actions demonstrate not a bias in favor of liberal views but
rather a commitment to a balanced presentation of diverse opinions.


    

Determining which of the following would be most useful
in evaluating the cogency of the magazine publisher’s response?


    

 


    

A.      
Whether any other magazines in which the book was
reviewed carried more than one review of the book


    

B.       
Whether the magazine publishes unsolicited book reviews
as well as those that it has commissioned


    

C.      
Whether in
the event that a first review commissioned by the magazine takes a clearly
liberal position the magazine would make any efforts to obtain further reviews


    

D.      
Whether the book that was the subject of the two reviews
was itself written from a clearly conservative or a clearly liberal point of
view


    

E.       
Whether most of the readers of the magazine regularly
read the book reviews that the magazine publishes



题目说没有对于liberal的 bias而是各种观点的平衡


    

证据:包含保守观念的REVIEW,直到有了另一份LIBERAL版本之后才发布。

C 选项是不是说,看第一个保守的review是否对liberal有一个正确的position,而不至于影响接下来后面写的review(综述)

感觉对这个句子的结构不太明了,拿出来讨论一下。



    


    


沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-10 17:30:00 | 只看该作者
up
板凳
发表于 2008-7-10 22:14:00 | 只看该作者
argument应该是说要review里要各种观点都有,所以杂志没有liberal bias
所以如果第一份review是保守的话,第二份review一定要liberal的才会发表,这样才能做到各种观点都有
但是如果第一份review就是liberal的话,如果杂志社没有继续找其他观点的review,那他们就会有liberal bias,因为只有liberal一种观点
其他选项都是无关选项
希望能帮到你
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-11 00:26:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢lovkobe!我好像有点开窍了。^。^!
题目应该是这个意思吧,这个magazine可能会给一本书写 several个review。

结论是说,没有自由主义的偏见。
在论证过程分为两种情况,
他只说了一种情况,就是先有了保守的,要等到有自由主义的才会发表。
但是确没有提及,如果先收到的是自由主义的会怎样,选项就是对这个地方进行了补充评估~~

谢谢哦!!
5#
发表于 2009-7-30 17:54:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-13 00:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部