OG-46

baby911 · 发表于 2004-5-10 11:42:00

谁能解释一下这道题目？

bettyamen · 发表于 2004-9-17 11:25:00

I got a headache for this question too, who could explain it,please show.

流沙 · 发表于 2004-9-17 12:44:00

建议把题目贴上来。

我对这道题的理解是，前提，Kale比spinach营养丰富，collard比lettuce营养丰富。÷需要推导的结果是kale比lettuce营养丰富。

题目问的是，下面哪个条件加进去使上面的结果不能成立。

leeon · 发表于 2004-9-17 15:05:00

6. Kale has more nutritional value than spinach. But since collard greens have more nutritional value than lettuce, it follows that kale has more nutritional value than lettuce.

Any of the following, if introduced into the argument as an additional premise, makes the argument above logically correct EXCEPT:

(A) Collard greens have more nutritional value than kale.

(B) Spinach has more nutritional value than lettuce.

(C) Spinach has more nutritional value than collard greens.

(D) Spinach and collard greens have the same nutritional value.（A）

(E) Kale and collard greens have the same nutritional value.

这题其实很简单的，就当做数学提：

K>S,C>L；＝>K>L.问哪一个不能成为原文成立的假设。A说C>K，当然推不出原文的结论。

bettyamen · 发表于 2004-9-20 10:13:00

Thank you, make a sense now.

KATIEUS · 发表于 2006-11-15 21:01:00

这题其实很简单的，就当做数学提！

up！

OG-46

OG-46

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()