ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2915|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-18-3

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-22 15:57:00 | 只看该作者

大全-18-3

3.     A 20 percent decline in lobster catches in Maine waters since 1980 can be justifiably blamed on legislation passed in 1972 to protect harbor seals. Maine’s population of harbor seals is now double the level existing before protection was initiated, and these seals are known to eat both fish and lobsters.


Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?


(A) Harbor seals usually eat more fish than lobsters, but the seals are natural predators of both.


(B) Although harbor seals are skillful predators of lobsters, they rarely finish eating their catch.


(C) Harbor seals attract tourists to Maine’s coastal areas, thus revitalizing the local economy.


(D) Authors of the 1972 legislation protecting harbor seals were convinced that an increase in that animal’s numbers would not have a measurably negative impact on the lobster catch.E


(E) The record lobster harvests of the late 1970’s removed large numbers of mature lobsters from the reproductive stock.



还有几道,不好意思

沙发
发表于 2005-8-1 17:53:00 | 只看该作者

请问各位NN,D为什么不对?


非常感谢

板凳
发表于 2005-8-1 23:46:00 | 只看该作者


结论是:1972年开始海豹多了导致1980年后虾少了。问削弱。


A:除了重复原文的内容外,又加了一点无关信息,即吃鱼多。


B:很少吃完虾;无关。反正吃不完估计也死了,归根结底会使虾数量减少。


C:无关。


D:立法者的态度已经不重要了。


E:70年代后期的记录显示很多成年虾(会生育小虾的哦)被捕;他因,说明不一定是海豹把虾干掉啦。



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-1 23:45:57编辑过]
地板
发表于 2005-8-3 20:48:00 | 只看该作者

非常感谢牛牛ethyl


久仰大名,您的图片也一直让人印象深刻的

5#
发表于 2005-11-17 15:18:00 | 只看该作者

呵呵,


我也覺得ethyl版主蠻幽默的


有時候看過以前他所寫的一些文章都蠻有趣的


的確讓人印象深刻


跟版主學習中

6#
发表于 2006-3-12 12:35:00 | 只看该作者

谁能解释一下E的意思,非常感谢!


(E) The record lobster harvests of the late 1970’s removed large numbers of mature lobsters from the reproductive stock.


您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-4 16:51
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部