ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1824|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[讨论]OG11-第23篇-130 (新文章)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-31 20:25:00 | 只看该作者

[讨论]OG11-第23篇-130 (新文章)

偶得疑问是130题,定位于第二段

In the fall of 1954, for example, C. Vann  (10) Woodward delivered a lecture series at the University  of Virginia that challenged
                    the prevailing dogma
 (concerning the history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation in the South). #  He argued that the Jim Crow laws of the 
(15) nineteenth and early twentieth centuries   not only codified traditional practice but also were a determined effort to erase the progress made by black people during and after Reconstruction in the 1870's. #  This revisionist (20) of Jim Crow
                legislation grew in part from the research that Woodward had done for the legal campaign during its preparation for Brown
v. Board of Education
The Supreme Court had  issued its ruling in this epochal desegregation case
(25) a few months before Woodward's lectures.

130. It can be inferred from the passage that the "prevailing dogma" (lines 11-12) held that

(A)            Jim Crow laws were passed to give legal status to well-established discriminatory practices in the South

(B)           Jim Crow laws were passed to establish order and uniformity in the discriminatory prac­tices of different southern states

OG选项解释  A       Correct. This correctly states the prevailing view of the Jim Crow laws.

                       B        The passage does not discuss differences in discriminatory practices among the southern states.

偶的疑问:偶是在想不出来怎么会有A的推导结果,如果B将different southern satates换作South,也就正确了吧

难道是Jim Crow Law codified triditional practice 辅助推出?而这个pratice也就是discriminatory practices?做第一遍的时候偶还不认识codified一词。。。。。。。。   请指教!!!!  

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

再勇敢的PO一下我对这段的理解,正在学习wangyu73cn大牛对og解释的研究方法,copy之

第一层次总括例子的大意,记住的要点是黑体字,需要做题时再定位是时间点和括号中的关于prevailing dogma的内荣 ;        第二层次展开说例子的具体细节:要点是黑体字,需要active reading的是not only....but also...的两部分观点.这一句话OG解释的实在精彩,揭开了看似何其简单not only...but also ...中间所藏的玄机,他说:

Recognize the logical  structure of this sentence. Woodward's argument concedes 承认the prevailing view (expressed in the  not only portion of the sentence: coded traditional practice)•, Woodward's challenge is then expressed
    
in the 
but also portion of the sentence: determined effort to erase ... progress.

这就是所要active reading的吧,一个not only...but also...就明确道出了那些是W要认同的,那些是不认同的,而不认同的,恰恰就是prevailing view所held的观点。而且想到这这些问题134的答案也就出来了

其实在第一遍读的时候就想到了:这一定是要取非,得到 Jim Crow laws的内容。但最后还是做错了。。。。。。。         第三个层次大概看了一下,觉得是讲背景知识的,即了一下大概要点,过之。

分析的这一点请大家拍砖!探究Active reading的路真是漫漫其修远兮,需要大家指正,想的还有不周,抛砖引玉             ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-7-31 20:36:57编辑过]
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2006-7-31 20:38:00 | 只看该作者

自己顶一个,格式太难调了。。。。

板凳
发表于 2006-9-1 17:48:00 | 只看该作者

請問答案裡的 were passed to 是什麼意思?

Jim Crow laws were passed to give legal status to well-established discriminatory practices in the South

地板
发表于 2006-9-2 13:23:00 | 只看该作者

 Jim Crow laws were passed,就是JC 这个法令被通过.to .....就是表目的吧..

我做130 题 时主要是抓动词,,看动词表意有无瑕疵,

A选项:give legal status to =原文的codify.

而B中,establish order and uniformity,和原文的意思有出入,文章中没有说建立的意思,所以不是原文的同等改写.

 

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-27 00:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部